Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognostic Value of Renal Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Open access
Dimopoulos, Konstantinos, Diller, Gerhard-Paul, Koltsida, Evdokia, Pijuan-Domenech, Antonia, Papadopoulou, Sofia A., Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., Salukhe, Tushar V., Piepoli, Massimo F., Poole-Wilson, Philip A., Best, Nicky, Francis, Darrel P., Gatzoulis, Michael A.·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Renal insufficiency in patients with ischemic heart disease and acquired heart failure is associated with higher mortality and morbidity. We studied the prevalence of renal dysfunction in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and its relation to outcome. Methods and Results— A total of 1102 adult patients with congenital heart disease (age 36.0±14.2 years) attending our institution between 1999 and 2006 had creatinine concentration measured. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Patients were divided into groups of normal GFR (≥90 mL · min −1 · 1.73 m −2 ), mildly impaired GFR (60 to 89 mL · min −1 · 1.73 m −2 ), and moderately/severely impaired GFR (<60 mL · min −1 · 1.73 m −2 ). Survival was compared between GFR groups by Cox regression. Median follow-up was 4.1 years, during which 103 patients died. Renal dysfunction was mild in 41% of patients and moderate or severe in 9%. A decrease in GFR was more common among patients with Eisenmenger physiology, of whom 72% had reduced GFR (<90 mL · min −1 · 1.73 m −2 , P <0.0001 compared with the remainder), and in 18%, this was moderate or severe ( P =0.007). Renal dysfunction had a substantial impact on mortality (propensity score–weighted hazard ratio 3.25, 95% CI 1.54 to 6.86, P =0.002 for moderately or severely impaired versus normal GFR). Conclusions— Deranged physiology in adult patients with congenital heart disease is not limited to the heart but also affects the kidney. Mortality is 3-fold higher than normal in the 1 in 11 patients who have moderate or severe GFR reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.734921

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Dimopoulos, K., Diller, G.-P., Koltsida, E., Pijuan-Domenech, A., Papadopoulou, S. A., Babu-Narayan, S. V., Salukhe, T. V., Piepoli, M. F., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Best, N., Francis, D. P., & Gatzoulis, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-05-06
Volume
117
Issue
18
Pages
2320-2328
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2148934940
Cited by
402
References
4
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognostic Value of Renal Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.734921
The paper
Dimopoulos, K., Diller, G.-P., Koltsida, E., Pijuan-Domenech, A., Papadopoulou, S. A., Babu-Narayan, S. V., Salukhe, T. V., Piepoli, M. F., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Best, N., Francis, D. P., & Gatzoulis, M. A. (2008). Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognostic Value of Renal Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.734921

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.