The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prasugrel Compared With High Loading- and Maintenance-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial
Abstract
Background— The increasing use of higher-than-approved doses of clopidogrel in clinical practice is based in part on the desire for greater levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). Prasugrel is a new thienopyridine that is more potent than standard-dose clopidogrel in healthy subjects and patients with stable coronary artery disease. The relative antiplatelet effects of prasugrel versus high-dose clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention patients are unknown. Methods and Results— Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 (PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44) was a randomized, double-blind, 2-phase crossover study of prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point of the loading-dose phase (prasugrel 60 mg versus clopidogrel 600 mg) was IPA with 20 μmol/L ADP at 6 hours. Patients with percutaneous coronary intervention entered the maintenance-dose phase, a 28-day crossover comparison of prasugrel 10 mg/d versus clopidogrel 150 mg/d with a primary end point of IPA after 14 days of either drug. In this study, 201 subjects were randomized. IPA at 6 hours was significantly higher in subjects receiving prasugrel (mean±SD, 74.8±13.0%) compared with clopidogrel (31.8±21.1%; P <0.0001). During the maintenance-dose phase, IPA with 20 μmol/L ADP was higher in subjects receiving prasugrel (61.3±17.8%) compared with clopidogrel (46.1±21.3%; P <0.0001). Results were consistent across all key secondary end points; significant differences emerged by 30 minutes and persisted across all time points. Conclusions— Among patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with planned percutaneous coronary intervention, loading with 60 mg prasugrel resulted in greater platelet inhibition than a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose. Maintenance therapy with prasugrel 10 mg/d resulted in a greater antiplatelet effect than 150 mg/d clopidogrel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Wiviott, S. D., Braunwald, E., McCabe, C. H., Montalescot, G., Ruzyllo, W., Gottlieb, S., Neumann, F.-J., Ardissino, D., De Servi, S., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706482 · Cited by 6,790
Self-citation
Cited by
Roffi, M., Patrono, C., Collet, J.-P., Mueller, C., Valgimigli, M., Andreotti, F., Bax, J. J., Borger, M. A., Brotons, C., Chew, D. P., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 · Cited by 8,261
Self-citationPrasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Wiviott, S. D., Braunwald, E., McCabe, C. H., Montalescot, G., Ruzyllo, W., Gottlieb, S., Neumann, F.-J., Ardissino, D., De Servi, S., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706482 · Cited by 6,790
Self-citation2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., Jaffe, A. S., Jneid, H., Kelly, R. F., Kontos, M. C., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 · Cited by 3,595
Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., Jaffe, A. S., Jneid, H., Kelly, R. F., Kontos, M. C., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000134 · Cited by 1,059
Wiviott, S. D., Braunwald, E., Angiolillo, D. J., Meisel, S., Dalby, A. J., Verheugt, F. W. A., Goodman, S. G., Corbalan, R., Purdy, D. A., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.791061 · Cited by 754
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiviott, S. D., Trenk, D., Frelinger, A. L., O’Donoghue, M., Neumann, F.-J., Michelson, A. D., Angiolillo, D. J., Hod, H., Montalescot, G., Miller, D. L., Jakubowski, J. A., Cairns, R., Murphy, S. A., McCabe, C. H., Antman, E. M., & Braunwald, E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2923-2932
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2152823642
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 62.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prasugrel Compared With High Loading- and Maintenance-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.740324
- The paper
- Wiviott, S. D., Trenk, D., Frelinger, A. L., O’Donoghue, M., Neumann, F.-J., Michelson, A. D., Angiolillo, D. J., Hod, H., Montalescot, G., Miller, D. L., Jakubowski, J. A., Cairns, R., Murphy, S. A., McCabe, C. H., Antman, E. M., & Braunwald, E. (2007). Prasugrel Compared With High Loading- and Maintenance-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.740324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.