The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials
Open accessAbstract
Background— Randomized trials that studied clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are underpowered to properly assess safety end points like death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Pooling data from randomized controlled trials increases the statistical power and allows better assessment of the treatment effect in high-risk subgroups. Methods and Results— We performed a pooled analysis of 3051 patients in 4 randomized trials evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of PCI with stenting and CABG at 5 years for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. The primary end point was the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The secondary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents, death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. We tested for heterogeneities in treatment effect in patient subgroups. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar in patients randomized to PCI with stenting versus CABG (16.7% versus 16.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.27; P =0.69). Repeat revascularization, however, occurred significantly more frequently after PCI than CABG (29.0% versus 7.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.29; P <0.001). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI than the CABG group (39.2% versus 23.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.61; P <0.001). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was found in the subgroups, including diabetic patients and those presenting with 3-vessel disease. Conclusions— In this pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials, PCI with stenting was associated with a long-term safety profile similar to that of CABG. However, as a result of persistently lower repeat revascularization rates in the CABG patients, overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates were significantly lower in the CABG group at 5 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents
Stone, G. W., Moses, J. W., Ellis, S. G., Schofer, J., Dawkins, K. D., Morice, M.-C., Colombo, A., Schampaert, E., Grube, E., Kirtane, A. J., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067193 · Cited by 1,631
Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease
(1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199607253350401 · Cited by 1,531
Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis
Stettler, C., Wandel, S., Allemann, S., Kastrati, A., Morice, M. C., Schömig, A., Pfisterer, M. E., Stone, G. W., Leon, M. B., de Lezo, J. S., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61444-5 · Cited by 1,428
Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease
Serruys, P. W., Unger, F., Sousa, J. E., Jatene, A., Bonnier, H. J. R. M., Schönberger, J. P. A. M., Buller, N., Bonser, R., van den Brand, M. J. B., van Herwerden, L. A., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200104123441502 · Cited by 1,114
Self-citationAnalysis of 14 Trials Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents
Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Pache, J., Kaiser, C., Valgimigli, M., Kelbæk, H., Menichelli, M., Sabaté, M., Suttorp, M. J., Baumgart, D., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067484 · Cited by 1,006
Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent Implantation
Hannan, E. L., Racz, M. J., Walford, G., Jones, R. H., Ryan, T. J., Bennett, E., Culliford, A. T., Isom, O. W., Gold, J. P., & Rose, E. A. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040316 · Cited by 664
Serruys, P. W., Ong, A. T. L., van Herwerden, L. A., Sousa, J. E., Jatene, A., Bonnier, J. J. R. M., Schönberger, J. P. M. A., Buller, N., Bonser, R., Disco, C., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082 · Cited by 608
Self-citationHueb, W., Lopes, N. H., Gersh, B. J., Soares, P., Machado, L. A. C., Jatene, F. B., Oliveira, S. A., & Ramires, J. A. F. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.625475 · Cited by 576
Self-citation
Cited by
Serruys, P. W., Morice, M.-C., Kappetein, A. P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D. R., Mack, M. J., Ståhle, E., Feldman, T. E., van den Brand, M., Bass, E. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0804626 · Cited by 4,331
Self-citationFihn, S. D., Blankenship, J. C., Alexander, K. P., Bittl, J. A., Byrne, J. G., Fletcher, B. J., Fonarow, G. C., Lange, R. A., Levine, G. N., Maddox, T. M., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000095 · Cited by 1,029
Head, S. J., Milojevic, M., Daemen, J., Ahn, J.-M., Boersma, E., Christiansen, E. H., Domanski, M. J., Farkouh, M. E., Flather, M., Fuster, V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30423-9 · Cited by 734
Self-citationFihn, S. D., Blankenship, J. C., Alexander, K. P., Bittl, J. A., Byrne, J. G., Fletcher, B. J., Fonarow, G. C., Lange, R. A., Levine, G. N., Maddox, T. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017 · Cited by 699
Garg, S., & Serruys, P. W. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.007 · Cited by 501
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Daemen, J., Boersma, E., Flather, M., Booth, J., Stables, R., Rodriguez, A., Rodriguez-Granillo, G., Hueb, W. A., Lemos, P. A., & Serruys, P. W.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2008-09-09
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1146-1154
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2089204790
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 34.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.752147
- The paper
- Daemen, J., Boersma, E., Flather, M., Booth, J., Stables, R., Rodriguez, A., Rodriguez-Granillo, G., Hueb, W. A., Lemos, P. A., & Serruys, P. W. (2008). Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.752147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
