Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Systemic Cardiac Amyloidoses: Disease Profiles and Clinical Courses of the 3 Main Types

Rapezzi, Claudio, Merlini, Giampaolo, Quarta, Candida C., Riva, Letizia, Longhi, Simone, Leone, Ornella, Salvi, Fabrizio, Ciliberti, Paolo, Pastorelli, Francesca, Biagini, Elena, Coccolo, Fabio, Cooke, Robin M.T., Bacchi-Reggiani, Letizia, Sangiorgi, Diego, Ferlini, Alessandra, Cavo, Michele, Zamagni, Elena, Fonte, Maria Luisa, Palladini, Giovanni, Salinaro, Francesco, Musca, Francesco, Obici, Laura, Branzi, Angelo, Perlini, Stefano·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Most studies of amyloidotic cardiomyopathy consider as a single entity the 3 main systemic cardiac amyloidoses: acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain (AL); hereditary, mutated transthyretin-related (ATTRm); and wild-type transthyretin-related (ATTRwt). In this study, we compared the diagnostic/clinical profiles of these 3 types of systemic cardiac amyloidosis. Methods and Results— We conducted a longitudinal study of 233 patients with clear-cut diagnosis by type of cardiac amyloidosis (AL, n=157; ATTRm, n=61; ATTRwt, n=15) at 2 large Italian centers providing coordinated amyloidosis diagnosis/management facilities since 1990. Average age at diagnosis was higher in AL than in ATTRm patients; all ATTRwt patients except 1 were elderly men. At diagnosis, mean left ventricular wall thickness was higher in ATTRwt than in ATTRm and AL. Left ventricular ejection fraction was moderately depressed in ATTRwt but not in AL or ATTRm. ATTRm patients less often displayed low QRS voltage (25% versus 60% in AL; P <0.0001) or low voltage-to-mass ratio (1.1±0.5 versus 0.9±0.5; P <0.0001). AL patients appeared to have greater hemodynamic impairment. On multivariate analysis, ATTRm was a strongly favorable predictor of survival, and ATTRwt predicted freedom from major cardiac events. Conclusions— AL, ATTRm, and ATTRwt should be considered 3 different cardiac diseases, probably characterized by different pathophysiological substrates and courses. Awareness of the diversity underlying the cardiac amyloidosis label is important on several levels, ranging from disease classification to diagnosis and clinical management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.108.843334

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
Rapezzi, C., Merlini, G., Quarta, C. C., Riva, L., Longhi, S., Leone, O., Salvi, F., Ciliberti, P., Pastorelli, F., Biagini, E., Coccolo, F., Cooke, R. M. T., Bacchi-Reggiani, L., Sangiorgi, D., Ferlini, A., Cavo, M., Zamagni, E., Fonte, M. L., Palladini, G., Salinaro, F., Musca, F., Obici, L., Branzi, A., & Perlini, S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-09-29
Volume
120
Issue
13
Pages
1203-1212
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2046145754
Cited by
774
References
0
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systemic Cardiac Amyloidoses: Disease Profiles and Clinical Courses of the 3 Main Types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.108.843334
The paper
Rapezzi, C., Merlini, G., Quarta, C. C., Riva, L., Longhi, S., Leone, O., Salvi, F., Ciliberti, P., Pastorelli, F., Biagini, E., Coccolo, F., Cooke, R. M. T., Bacchi-Reggiani, L., Sangiorgi, D., Ferlini, A., Cavo, M., Zamagni, E., Fonte, M. L., Palladini, G., . . . Perlini, S. (2009). Systemic Cardiac Amyloidoses: Disease Profiles and Clinical Courses of the 3 Main Types. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.843334

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.