Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic Assessment of Patients With Unexplained Cardiac Arrest: Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER)

Open access
Krahn, Andrew D., Healey, Jeffrey S., Chauhan, Vijay, Birnie, David H., Simpson, Christopher S., Champagne, Jean, Gardner, Martin, Sanatani, Shubhayan, Exner, Derek V., Klein, George J., Yee, Raymond, Skanes, Allan C., Gula, Lorne J., Gollob, Michael H.·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Cardiac arrest without evident cardiac disease may be caused by subclinical genetic conditions. Provocative testing to unmask a phenotype is often necessary to detect primary electrical disease, direct genetic testing, and perform family screening. Methods and Results— Patients with apparently unexplained cardiac arrest and no evident cardiac disease (normal cardiac function on echocardiogram, no evidence of coronary artery disease, and a normal ECG) underwent systematic evaluation that included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, signal-averaged ECG, exercise testing, drug challenge, and selective electrophysiological testing. Diagnostic criteria were based on accepted criteria or provocation of the characteristic clinical features for long-QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, Brugada syndrome, early repolarization, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, coronary spasm, and myocarditis. Sixty-three patients in 9 centers were enrolled (age 43.0±13.4 years, 29 women). A diagnosis was obtained in 35 patients (56%): Long-QT syndrome in 8, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 8, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in 6, early repolarization in 5, coronary spasm in 4, Brugada syndrome in 3, and myocarditis in 1. Targeted genetic testing demonstrated evidence of causative mutations in 9 (47%) of 19 patients. Screening of 64 family members of these patients identified 15 affected individuals who were treated (24%). The remaining 28 patients (44%) were considered to have idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Conclusions— Systematic clinical testing, including drug provocation and advanced imaging, results in unmasking of the cause of apparently unexplained cardiac arrest in >50% of patients. This approach assists in directing genetic testing to diagnose genetically mediated arrhythmia syndromes, which results in successful family screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.853143

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Krahn, A. D., Healey, J. S., Chauhan, V., Birnie, D. H., Simpson, C. S., Champagne, J., Gardner, M., Sanatani, S., Exner, D. V., Klein, G. J., Yee, R., Skanes, A. C., Gula, L. J., & Gollob, M. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
120
Issue
4
Pages
278-285
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2135570564
Cited by
340
References
50
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Assessment of Patients With Unexplained Cardiac Arrest: Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.853143
The paper
Krahn, A. D., Healey, J. S., Chauhan, V., Birnie, D. H., Simpson, C. S., Champagne, J., Gardner, M., Sanatani, S., Exner, D. V., Klein, G. J., Yee, R., Skanes, A. C., Gula, L. J., & Gollob, M. H. (2009). Systematic Assessment of Patients With Unexplained Cardiac Arrest: Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.853143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.