Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

γ-H2AX Foci as a Biomarker for Patient X-Ray Exposure in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: Are We Underestimating Radiation Risks?

Open access
Beels, Laurence, Bacher, Klaus, De Wolf, Daniël, Werbrouck, Joke, Thierens, Hubert·2009·Circulation

Abstract

Background— A better knowledge of patient x-ray dose and the associated radiation risk in pediatric interventional cardiology is warranted in view of the extensive use of x-rays and the higher radiosensitivity of children. In the present study, γ-H2AX foci were used as a biomarker for radiation-induced effects. Patient-specific dose was assessed and radiation risks were estimated according to the linear-no-threshold model, commonly used in radiation protection, and the γ-H2AX foci data. Methods and Results— In 49 pediatric patients (median age, 0.75 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization procedures, blood samples were taken before and shortly after the procedure. γ-H2AX foci were determined in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. In each patient, a net increase in γ-H2AX foci, representing DNA double-strand breaks induced by interventional x-rays, was observed. In addition, a patient-specific Monte Carlo simulation of the procedure was performed, resulting in individual blood, organ, and tissue doses. Plotting of γ-H2AX foci versus blood dose indicated a low-dose hypersensitivity. Median effective doses calculated according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection 60 and 103 publications are 5.6 and 6.4 mSv, respectively. The lifetime-attributable risk of cancer mortality was calculated from the linear-no-threshold model and the γ-H2AX foci data. This resulted in lifetime-attributable risk values of 1% and 4%, respectively, for the patient population under study. Conclusions— γ-H2AX foci as a biomarker for DNA damage indicate that radiation risk estimates according to the linear-no-threshold hypothesis are possibly underestimates. Great care should be taken to minimize and optimize patient radiation exposure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.880385

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Beels, L., Bacher, K., De Wolf, D., Werbrouck, J., & Thierens, H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2009-11-10
Volume
120
Issue
19
Pages
1903-1909
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2162553051
Cited by
169
References
4
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: γ-H2AX Foci as a Biomarker for Patient X-Ray Exposure in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: Are We Underestimating Radiation Risks? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.880385
The paper
Beels, L., Bacher, K., De Wolf, D., Werbrouck, J., & Thierens, H. (2009). γ-H2AX Foci as a Biomarker for Patient X-Ray Exposure in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization: Are We Underestimating Radiation Risks? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.880385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.