The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract
Background— Computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to detect coronary artery disease, but the evaluation of stenoses is often uncertain. Perfusion imaging has an established role in detecting ischemia and guiding therapy. Hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/CT allows combination angiography and perfusion imaging in short, quantitative, low-radiation-dose protocols. Methods and Results— We enrolled 107 patients with an intermediate (30% to 70%) pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent PET/CT (quantitative PET with 15 O-water and CT angiography), and the results were compared with the gold standard, invasive angiography, including measurement of fractional flow reserve when appropriate. Although PET and CT angiography alone both demonstrated 97% negative predictive value, CT angiography alone was suboptimal in assessing the severity of stenosis (positive predictive value, 81%). Perfusion imaging alone could not always separate microvascular disease from epicardial stenoses, but hybrid PET/CT significantly improved this accuracy to 98%. The radiation dose of the combined PET and CT protocols was 9.3 mSv (86 patients) with prospective triggering and 21.8 mSv (21 patients) with spiral CT. Conclusion— Cardiac hybrid PET/CT imaging allows accurate noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease in a symptomatic population. The method is feasible and can be performed routinely with <10 mSv in most patients. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00627172.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Diamond, G. A., & Forrester, J. S. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197906143002402 · Cited by 2,664
Cited by
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Task Force Members, Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., Bugiardini, R., Crea, F., Cuisset, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · Cited by 4,510
Self-citationMurthy, V. L., Bateman, T. M., Beanlands, R. S., Berman, D. S., Borges-Neto, S., Chareonthaitawee, P., Cerqueira, M. D., deKemp, R. A., DePuey, E. G., Dilsizian, V., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.201368 · Cited by 346
Ziadi, M. C., deKemp, R. A., Williams, K., Guo, A., Renaud, J. M., Chow, B. J. W., Klein, R., Ruddy, T. D., Aung, M., Garrard, L., et al. (2012) · Journal of Nuclear Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s12350-011-9506-5 · Cited by 301
Leuschner, F., & Nahrendorf, M. (2011) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.110.232678 · Cited by 110
Park, J.-W., Shin, E.-S., Ann, S. H., Gödde, M., Park, L. S.-I., Brachmann, J., Vidal-Lopez, S., Wierzbinski, J., Lam, Y.-Y., & Jung, F. (2015) · Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · doi:10.3233/ch-141912 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kajander, S., Joutsiniemi, E., Saraste, M., Pietilä, M., Ukkonen, H., Saraste, A., Sipilä, H. T., Teräs, M., Mäki, M., Airaksinen, J., Hartiala, J., & Knuuti, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2010-08-10
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 603-613
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2165548906
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.915009
- The paper
- Kajander, S., Joutsiniemi, E., Saraste, M., Pietilä, M., Ukkonen, H., Saraste, A., Sipilä, H. T., Teräs, M., Mäki, M., Airaksinen, J., Hartiala, J., & Knuuti, J. (2010). Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.915009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.