The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Human Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: From Promise to Disappointment?
Abstract
Background— We assessed whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves myocardial, renal, and lung protection after on-pump coronary surgery. Methods and Results— This was a single-center, prospective, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial. Patients, investigators, anesthetists, surgeons, and critical care teams were blinded to group allocation. Subjects received RIPC (or placebo) stimuli (×3 upper limb (or dummy arm), 5-minute cycles of 200 mm Hg cuff inflation/deflation) before aortic clamping. Anesthesia, perfusion, cardioplegia, and surgical techniques were standardized. The primary end point was 48-hour area under the curve (AUC) troponin T (cTnT) release. Secondary end points were 6-hour and peak cTnT, ECG changes, cardiac index, inotrope and vasoconstrictor use, renal dysfunction, and lung injury. Hospital survival was 99.4%. Comparing placebo and RIPC, median (interquartile range) AUC 48-hour cTnT (ng/mL −1 /48 h −1 ); 28 (19, 39) versus 30 (22, 38), 6-hour cTnT (ng/mL −1 ); 0.93(0.59, 1.35) versus 1.01(0.72, 1.43), peak cTnT (ng/mL −1 ); 1.02 (0.74, 1.44) versus 1.04 (0.78, 1.51), de novo left bundle-branch block (4% versus 0%) and Q waves (5.3% versus 5.5%), serial cardiac indices, intraaortic balloon pump usage (8.5% versus 7.5%), inotrope (39% versus 50%) and vasoconstrictor usage (66% versus 64%) were not different. Dialysis requirement (1.2% versus 3.8%), peak creatinine (median [interquartile range], 1.2 mg/dL −1 (1.1, 1.4) versus 1.2 (1.0, 1.4)), and AUC urinary albumin-creatinine ratios 69 (40, 112) versus 58 (32, 85) were not different. Intubation times; median (interquartile range), 937 minutes(766, 1402) versus 895(675, 1180), 6-hour; 278 (210, 338) versus 270 (218, 323) and 12-hour pO 2 :FiO 2 ratios 255 (195, 323) versus 263 (210, 308) were similar. Conclusions— In contrast to prior smaller studies, RIPC did not reduce troponin release, improve hemodynamics, or enhance renal or lung protection. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.ukcrn.org.uk. Unique identifier: 4659.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., Bittl, J. A., Bridges, C. R., Byrne, J. G., Cigarroa, J. E., DiSesa, V. J., Hiratzka, L. F., Hutter, A. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009 · Cited by 820
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery
Hausenloy, D. J., Candilio, L., Evans, R., Ariti, C., Jenkins, D. P., Kolvekar, S., Knight, R., Kunst, G., Laing, C., Nicholas, J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1413534 · Cited by 722
Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery
Hausenloy, D. J., Barrabes, J. A., Bøtker, H. E., Davidson, S. M., Di Lisa, F., Downey, J., Engstrom, T., Ferdinandy, P., Carbrera-Fuentes, H. A., Heusch, G., et al. (2016) · Basic Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00395-016-0588-8 · Cited by 308
Cardioprotection during cardiac surgery.
Hausenloy, D. J., Boston-Griffiths, E., & Yellon, D. M. (2012) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvs131 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahman, I. A., Mascaro, J. G., Steeds, R. P., Frenneaux, M. P., Nightingale, P., Gosling, P., Townsend, P., Townend, J. N., Green, D., & Bonser, R. S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2010-09-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 11_suppl_1
- Pages
- S53-9
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2099501766
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Human Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: From Promise to Disappointment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.926667
- The paper
- Rahman, I. A., Mascaro, J. G., Steeds, R. P., Frenneaux, M. P., Nightingale, P., Gosling, P., Townsend, P., Townend, J. N., Green, D., & Bonser, R. S. (2010). Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Human Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: From Promise to Disappointment? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.926667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.