Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women?

Open access
Petrov, George, Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera, Lehmkuhl, Elke, Krabatsch, Thomas, Dunkel, Anne, Dandel, Michael, Dworatzek, Elke, Mahmoodzadeh, Shokoufeh, Schubert, Carola, Becher, Eva, Hampl, Hannah, Hetzer, Roland·2010·Circulation

Abstract

Background— In patients with aortic stenosis, pressure overload induces cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Female sex and estrogens influence cardiac remodeling and fibrosis in animal models and in men. Sex differences and their molecular mechanisms in hypertrophy regression after aortic valve replacement have not yet been studied. Methods and Results— We prospectively obtained preoperative and early postoperative echocardiography in 92 patients, 53 women and 39 men, undergoing aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis. We analyzed in a subgroup of 10 patients matrix gene expression in left ventricular (LV) biopsies. In addition, we determined the effect of 17β-estradiol on collagen synthesis in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts. Preoperatively, women and men had similar ejection fraction. Similar percentages of women and men had increased LV diameters (37% and 38%). Women more frequently exhibited LV hypertrophy than men (women: 86%; men: 56%; P <0.01). Postoperatively, increased LV diameters persisted in 34% of men but only in 12% of women ( P <0.023). LV hypertrophy reversed more frequently in women than in men, leading to a similar prevalence of LV hypertrophy after surgery (women: 45%; men: 36%). In surgical biopsies, men had significantly higher collagen I and III and matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene expression than women. In isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts, 17β-estradiol significantly increased collagen I and III gene expressions in male cells but decreased it in female cells. Conclusion— Women adapt to pressure overload differently from men. Less fibrosis before surgery may enable faster regression after surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.109.927764

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Petrov, G., Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Lehmkuhl, E., Krabatsch, T., Dunkel, A., Dandel, M., Dworatzek, E., Mahmoodzadeh, S., Schubert, C., Becher, E., Hampl, H., & Hetzer, R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2010-09-14
Volume
122
Issue
11_suppl_1
Pages
S23-8
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1993702845
Cited by
230
References
0
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927764
The paper
Petrov, G., Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Lehmkuhl, E., Krabatsch, T., Dunkel, A., Dandel, M., Dworatzek, E., Mahmoodzadeh, S., Schubert, C., Becher, E., Hampl, H., & Hetzer, R. (2010). Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927764

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.