The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women?
Open accessAbstract
Background— In patients with aortic stenosis, pressure overload induces cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Female sex and estrogens influence cardiac remodeling and fibrosis in animal models and in men. Sex differences and their molecular mechanisms in hypertrophy regression after aortic valve replacement have not yet been studied. Methods and Results— We prospectively obtained preoperative and early postoperative echocardiography in 92 patients, 53 women and 39 men, undergoing aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis. We analyzed in a subgroup of 10 patients matrix gene expression in left ventricular (LV) biopsies. In addition, we determined the effect of 17β-estradiol on collagen synthesis in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts. Preoperatively, women and men had similar ejection fraction. Similar percentages of women and men had increased LV diameters (37% and 38%). Women more frequently exhibited LV hypertrophy than men (women: 86%; men: 56%; P <0.01). Postoperatively, increased LV diameters persisted in 34% of men but only in 12% of women ( P <0.023). LV hypertrophy reversed more frequently in women than in men, leading to a similar prevalence of LV hypertrophy after surgery (women: 45%; men: 36%). In surgical biopsies, men had significantly higher collagen I and III and matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene expression than women. In isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts, 17β-estradiol significantly increased collagen I and III gene expressions in male cells but decreased it in female cells. Conclusion— Women adapt to pressure overload differently from men. Less fibrosis before surgery may enable faster regression after surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine
Mauvais-Jarvis, F., Bairey Merz, N., Barnes, P. J., Brinton, R. D., Carrero, J.-J., DeMeo, D. L., De Vries, G. J., Epperson, C. N., Govindan, R., Klein, S. L., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31561-0 · Cited by 2,001
Self-citationPathological Ventricular Remodeling: Mechanisms: Part 1 of 2
Burchfield, J. S., Xie, M., & Hill, J. A. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.113.001878 · Cited by 766
Mechanistic Pathways of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease
Regitz-Zagrosek, V., & Kararigas, G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2015 · Cited by 732
Self-citationDworatzek, E., Mahmoodzadeh, S., Schubert, C., Westphal, C., Leber, J., Kusch, A., Kararigas, G., Fliegner, D., Moulin, M., Ventura-Clapier, R., et al. (2014) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvu065 · Cited by 79
Self-citationBeydoun, H. A., Beydoun, M. A., Liang, H., Dore, G. A., Shaked, D., Zonderman, A. B., & Eid, S. M. (2016) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.039 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrov, G., Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Lehmkuhl, E., Krabatsch, T., Dunkel, A., Dandel, M., Dworatzek, E., Mahmoodzadeh, S., Schubert, C., Becher, E., Hampl, H., & Hetzer, R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2010-09-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 11_suppl_1
- Pages
- S23-8
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1993702845
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927764
- The paper
- Petrov, G., Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Lehmkuhl, E., Krabatsch, T., Dunkel, A., Dandel, M., Dworatzek, E., Mahmoodzadeh, S., Schubert, C., Becher, E., Hampl, H., & Hetzer, R. (2010). Regression of Myocardial Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement: Faster in Women? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.927764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.