Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use of Emergency Medical Service Transport Among Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines

Open access
Mathews, Robin, Peterson, Eric D., Li, Shuang, Roe, Matthew T., Glickman, Seth W., Wiviott, Stephen D., Saucedo, Jorge F., Antman, Elliott M., Jacobs, Alice K., Wang, Tracy Y.·2011·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Activation of emergency medical services (EMS) is critical for the early triage and treatment of patients experiencing ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, yet data regarding EMS use and its association with subsequent clinical care are limited. Methods and Results—: We performed an observational analysis of 37 634 ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients treated at 372 US hospitals participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines between January 2007 and September 2009, and examined independent patient factors associated with EMS transportation versus patient self-transportation. We found that EMS transport was used in only 60% of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients. Older patients, those living farther from the hospital, and those with hemodynamic compromise were more likely to use EMS transport. In contrast, race, income, and education level did not appear to be associated with the mode of transport. Compared with self-transported patients, EMS-transported patients had significantly shorter delays in both symptom-onset-to-arrival time (median, 89 versus 120 minutes; P <0.0001) and door-to-reperfusion time (median door-to-balloon time, 63 versus 76 minutes; P <0.0001; median door-to-needle time, 23 versus 29 minutes; P <0.0001). Conclusions—: Emergency medical services transportation to the hospital is underused among contemporary ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients. Nevertheless, use of EMS transportation is associated with substantial reductions in ischemic time and treatment delays. Community education efforts are needed to improve the use of emergency transport as part of system-wide strategies to improve ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction reperfusion care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.110.002345

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Mathews, R., Peterson, E. D., Li, S., Roe, M. T., Glickman, S. W., Wiviott, S. D., Saucedo, J. F., Antman, E. M., Jacobs, A. K., & Wang, T. Y.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2011-07-12
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
154-163
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2001667737
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Emergency Medical Service Transport Among Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.002345
The paper
Mathews, R., Peterson, E. D., Li, S., Roe, M. T., Glickman, S. W., Wiviott, S. D., Saucedo, J. F., Antman, E. M., Jacobs, A. K., & Wang, T. Y. (2011). Use of Emergency Medical Service Transport Among Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.002345

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.