Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aortic Root Remodeling Over the Adult Life Course: Longitudinal Data From the Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Lam, Carolyn S.P., Xanthakis, Vanessa, Sullivan, Lisa M., Lieb, Wolfgang, Aragam, Jayashri, Redfield, Margaret M., Mitchell, Gary F., Benjamin, Emelia J., Vasan, Ramachandran S.·2010·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Aortic root remodeling in adulthood is known to be associated with cardiovascular outcomes. However, there is a lack of longitudinal data defining the clinical correlates of aortic root remodeling over the adult life course. Methods and Results— We used serial routine echocardiograms in participants of the Framingham Heart Study to track aortic root diameter over 16 years in mid to late adulthood and to determine its short-term (4 years; n=6099 observations in 3506 individuals) and long-term (16 years; n=14 628 observations in 4542 individuals) clinical correlates by multilevel modeling. Age, sex, body size, and blood pressure were principal correlates of aortic remodeling in both short- and long-term analyses (all P ≤0.01). Aortic root diameter increased with age in both men and women but was larger in men at any given age. Each 10-year increase in age was associated with a larger aortic root (by 0.89 mm in men and 0.68 mm in women) after adjustment for body size and blood pressure. A 5-kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was associated with a larger aortic root (by 0.78 mm in men and 0.51 mm in women) after adjustment for age and blood pressure. Each 10-mm Hg increase in pulse pressure was related to a smaller aortic root (by 0.19 mm in men and 0.08 mm in women) after adjustment for age and body size. Conclusions— These longitudinal community-based data show that aortic root remodeling occurs over mid to late adulthood and is principally associated with age, sex, body size, and blood pressure. The underlying basis for these differences and implications for the development of cardiovascular events deserve further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.110.937839

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Lam, C. S. P., Xanthakis, V., Sullivan, L. M., Lieb, W., Aragam, J., Redfield, M. M., Mitchell, G. F., Benjamin, E. J., & Vasan, R. S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2010-08-31
Volume
122
Issue
9
Pages
884-890
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1990981315
Cited by
184
References
3
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aortic Root Remodeling Over the Adult Life Course: Longitudinal Data From the Framingham Heart Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.110.937839
The paper
Lam, C. S. P., Xanthakis, V., Sullivan, L. M., Lieb, W., Aragam, J., Redfield, M. M., Mitchell, G. F., Benjamin, E. J., & Vasan, R. S. (2010). Aortic Root Remodeling Over the Adult Life Course: Longitudinal Data From the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.937839

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.