Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utility of Absolute and Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Reichlin, Tobias, Irfan, Affan, Twerenbold, Raphael, Reiter, Miriam, Hochholzer, Willibald, Burkhalter, Hanna, Bassetti, Stefano, Steuer, Stephan, Winkler, Katrin, Peter, Federico, Meissner, Julia, Haaf, Philip, Potocki, Mihael, Drexler, Beatrice, Osswald, Stefan, Mueller, Christian·2011·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Current guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), among other criteria, also require a rise and/or fall in cardiac troponin (cTn) levels. It is unknown whether absolute or relative changes in cTn have higher diagnostic accuracy and should therefore be preferred. Methods and Results—: In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of absolute (Δ) and relative (Δ%) changes in cTn in 836 patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of AMI. Blood samples for the determination of high-sensitive cTn T and cTn I ultra were collected at presentation and after 1 and 2 hours in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing AMI was significantly higher for 2-hour absolute (Δ) versus 2-hour relative (Δ%) cTn changes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval], high-sensitivity cTn T: 0.95 [0.92 to 0.98] versus 0.76 [0.70 to 0.83], P <0.001; cTn I ultra: 0.95 [0.91 to 0.99] versus 0.72 [0.66 to 0.79], P <0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve–derived cutoff value for 2-hour absolute (Δ) change was 0.007 μg/L for high-sensitivity cTn T and 0.020 μg/L for cTn I ultra (both cutoff levels are half of the 99th percentile of the respective cTn assay). Absolute changes were superior to relative changes in patients with both low and elevated baseline cTn levels. Conclusions—: Absolute changes of cTn levels have a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for AMI than relative changes, and seem therefore to be the preferred criteria to distinguish AMI from other causes of cTn elevations. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.111.023937

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Reichlin, T., Irfan, A., Twerenbold, R., Reiter, M., Hochholzer, W., Burkhalter, H., Bassetti, S., Steuer, S., Winkler, K., Peter, F., Meissner, J., Haaf, P., Potocki, M., Drexler, B., Osswald, S., & Mueller, C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2011-07-12
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
136-145
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2112739057
Cited by
460
References
2
FWCI
35.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of Absolute and Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.111.023937
The paper
Reichlin, T., Irfan, A., Twerenbold, R., Reiter, M., Hochholzer, W., Burkhalter, H., Bassetti, S., Steuer, S., Winkler, K., Peter, F., Meissner, J., Haaf, P., Potocki, M., Drexler, B., Osswald, S., & Mueller, C. (2011). Utility of Absolute and Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponin Concentrations in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.023937

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.