Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 850

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve

Open access
Murthy, Venkatesh L., Naya, Masanao, Foster, Courtney R., Hainer, Jon, Gaber, Mariya, Di Carli, Gilda, Blankstein, Ron, Dorbala, Sharmila, Sitek, Arkadiusz, Pencina, Michael J., Di Carli, Marcelo F.·2011·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Impaired vasodilator function is an early manifestation of coronary artery disease and may precede angiographic stenosis. It is unknown whether noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilator function in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease carries incremental prognostic significance. Methods and Results—: A total of 2783 consecutive patients referred for rest/stress positron emission tomography were followed up for a median of 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.7–3.2 years). The extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities were quantified by visual evaluation of myocardial perfusion images. Rest and stress myocardial blood flows were calculated with factor analysis and a 2-compartment kinetic model and were used to compute coronary flow reserve (coronary flow reserve equals stress divided by rest myocardial blood flow). The primary end point was cardiac death. Overall 3-year cardiac mortality was 8.0%. The lowest tertile of coronary flow reserve (<1.5) was associated with a 5.6-fold increase in the risk of cardiac death (95% confidence interval, 2.5–12.4; P <0.0001) compared with the highest tertile. Incorporation of coronary flow reserve into cardiac death risk assessment models resulted in an increase in the c index from 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.86) to 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.87; P =0.02) and in a net reclassification improvement of 0.098 (95% confidence interval, 0.025–0.180). Addition of coronary flow reserve resulted in correct reclassification of 34.8% of intermediate-risk patients (net reclassification improvement=0.487; 95% confidence interval, 0.262–0.731). Corresponding improvements in risk assessment for mortality from any cause were also demonstrated. Conclusion—: Noninvasive quantitative assessment of coronary vasodilator function with positron emission tomography is a powerful, independent predictor of cardiac mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and provides meaningful incremental risk stratification over clinical and gated myocardial perfusion imaging variables.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.111.050427

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 850

Metadata

Authors
Murthy, V. L., Naya, M., Foster, C. R., Hainer, J., Gaber, M., Di Carli, G., Blankstein, R., Dorbala, S., Sitek, A., Pencina, M. J., & Di Carli, M. F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
124
Issue
20
Pages
2215-2224
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2154342279
Cited by
850
References
1
FWCI
27.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.111.050427
The paper
Murthy, V. L., Naya, M., Foster, C. R., Hainer, J., Gaber, M., Di Carli, G., Blankstein, R., Dorbala, S., Sitek, A., Pencina, M. J., & Di Carli, M. F. (2011). Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.050427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.