Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aortic Event Rate in the Marfan Population: A Cohort Study

Jondeau, Guillaume, Detaint, Delphine, Tubach, Florence, Arnoult, Florence, Milleron, Olivier, Raoux, Francois, Delorme, Gabriel, Mimoun, Lea, Krapf, Laura, Hamroun, Dalil, Beroud, Christophe, Roy, Carine, Vahanian, Alec, Boileau, Catherine·2012·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Optimal management, including timing of surgery, remains debated in Marfan syndrome because of a lack of data on aortic risk associated with this disease. Methods and Results—: We used our database to evaluate aortic risk associated with standardized care. Patients who fulfilled the international criteria, had not had previous aortic surgery or dissection, and came to our center at least twice were included. Aortic measurements were made with echocardiography (every 2 years); patients were given systematic β-blockade and advice about sports activities. Prophylactic aortic surgery was proposed when the maximal aortic diameter reached 50 mm. Seven hundred thirty-two patients with Marfan syndrome were followed up for a mean of 6.6 years. Five deaths and 2 dissections of the ascending aorta occurred during follow-up. Event rate (death/aortic dissection) was 0.17%/y. Risk rose with increasing aortic diameter measured within 2 years of the event: from 0.09%/y per year (95% confidence interval, 0.00–0.20) when the aortic diameter was <40 mm to 0.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.00–0.71) with diameters of 45 to 49 mm and 1.33% (95% confidence interval, 0.00–3.93) with diameters of 50 to 54 mm. The risk increased 4 times at diameters ≥50 mm. The annual risk dropped below 0.05% when the aortic diameter was <50 mm after exclusion of a neonatal patient, a woman who became pregnant against our recommendation, and a 72-year-old woman with previous myocardial infarction. Conclusions—: Risk of sudden death or aortic dissection remains low in patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic diameter between 45 and 49 mm. Aortic diameter of 50 mm appears to be a reasonable threshold for prophylactic surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.111.054676

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Jondeau, G., Detaint, D., Tubach, F., Arnoult, F., Milleron, O., Raoux, F., Delorme, G., Mimoun, L., Krapf, L., Hamroun, D., Beroud, C., Roy, C., Vahanian, A., & Boileau, C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
226-232
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2030095794
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aortic Event Rate in the Marfan Population: A Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.111.054676
The paper
Jondeau, G., Detaint, D., Tubach, F., Arnoult, F., Milleron, O., Raoux, F., Delorme, G., Mimoun, L., Krapf, L., Hamroun, D., Beroud, C., Roy, C., Vahanian, A., & Boileau, C. (2012). Aortic Event Rate in the Marfan Population: A Cohort Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.054676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.