The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Elective Major Noncardiac Surgery After Coronary Stent Insertion: A Population-Based Study
Abstract
Background—: Guidelines recommend that noncardiac surgery be delayed until 30 to 45 days after bare-metal stent implantation and 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation. Methods and Results—: We used linked registry data and population-based administrative health care databases to conduct a cohort study of 8116 patients (≥40 years of age) who underwent major elective noncardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada between 2003 and 2009, and received coronary stents within 10 years before surgery. Approximately 34% (n=2725) underwent stent insertion within 2 years before surgery, of whom 905 (33%) received drug-eluting stents. For comparison, we assembled a separate cohort of 341 350 surgical patients who had not undergone coronary revascularization. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (mortality, readmission for acute coronary syndrome, or repeat coronary revascularization). The overall rate of 30-day events in patients with coronary stents was 2.1% (n=170). When the interval between stent insertion and surgery was <45 days, event rates were high for bare-metal (6.7%) and drug-eluting (20.0%) stents. When the interval was 45 to 180 days, the event rate for bare-metal stents was 2.6%, approaching that of intermediate-risk nonrevascularized individuals. Adjusted analyses suggested that event rates were increased if this interval exceeded 180 days. For drug-eluting stents, the event rate was 1.2% once the interval exceeded 180 days, approaching that of intermediate-risk nonrevascularized individuals. Conclusions—: The earliest optimal time for elective surgery is 46 to 180 days after bare-metal stent implantation or >180 days after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness and Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents in Ontario
Tu, J. V., Bowen, J., Chiu, M., Ko, D. T., Austin, P. C., He, Y., Hopkins, R., Tarride, J.-E., Blackhouse, G., Lazzam, C., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa071076 · Cited by 383
Self-citation
Cited by
Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Bittl, J. A., Brindis, R. G., Fihn, S. D., Fleisher, L. A., Granger, C. B., Lange, R. A., Mack, M. J., Mauri, L., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513 · Cited by 1,641
Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Bittl, J. A., Brindis, R. G., Fihn, S. D., Fleisher, L. A., Granger, C. B., Lange, R. A., Mack, M. J., Mauri, L., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000404 · Cited by 1,355
Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Bittl, J. A., Brindis, R. G., Fihn, S. D., Fleisher, L. A., Granger, C. B., Lange, R. A., Mack, M. J., Mauri, L., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wijeysundera, D. N., Wijeysundera, H. C., Yun, L., Wąsowicz, M., Beattie, W. S., Velianou, J. L., & Ko, D. T.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2012-09-11
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1355-1362
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2071957228
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Elective Major Noncardiac Surgery After Coronary Stent Insertion: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.112.102715
- The paper
- Wijeysundera, D. N., Wijeysundera, H. C., Yun, L., Wąsowicz, M., Beattie, W. S., Velianou, J. L., & Ko, D. T. (2012). Risk of Elective Major Noncardiac Surgery After Coronary Stent Insertion: A Population-Based Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.102715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.