Cited by 19Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementSurgical site infection preventionOrthopedic Infections and Treatments

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Dental Procedures: Are We Drilling in the Wrong Direction?

Open access
Lockhart, Peter B.·2012·Circulation

Abstract

T he possibility that bacteremia from the mouth could cause infective endocarditis (IE) was first suggested Ͼ100 years ago, and it was later reinforced by others who targeted the viridans group streptococci from poor oral hygiene and dental extractions.[1][2][3] These observations, along with the advent of antibiotics, eventually led to the first guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) in 1955.Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) became the primary focus for prevention of IE and a standard of care for countries around the world.Controversy concerning efficacy and safety issues has existed for Ͼ30 years, and there has been a progressive reduction in the patient populations and the procedures suggested for AP since that time.Of concern, and in spite of a decreasing emphasis on AP for cardiac patients, upwards of 25 noncardiac patient populations are recommended for AP by some clinicians out of concern for systemic infections that might originate from dental procedures (eg, prosthetic joints).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.112.115204

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Thayer W. Studies on bacterial (infective) endocarditis. Hopkins Hosp Rep. 1926;22:1-185.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lockhart, P. B.
Affiliations
Carolinas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lockhart, Peter B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2012-07-03
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
11-12
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1996289835
Cited by
19
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Keywords
antibiotic prophylaxis, dental treatment, infective endocarditis, bacteremia, Streptococcus viridans, artificial joints, systemic infection, prevention guidelines, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
American Heart Association, Endocarditis, Endocarditis, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Male, Streptococcal Infections, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Viridans Streptococci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review