Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 757

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Open access
Eberhardt, Robert T., Raffetto, Joseph D.·2014·Circulation

Abstract

Chronic venous disease is often overlooked by primary and cardiovascular care providers because of an underappreciation of the magnitude and impact of the problem. The importance of chronic venous disease is related to the number of people with the disease and the socioeconomic impact of its more severe manifestations. Unfortunately, the literature concerning the prevalence and incidence of chronic venous disease has varied greatly because of differences in the methods of evaluation, criteria for definition, and the geographic regions analyzed. The most common manifestations of chronic venous disease are dilated cutaneous veins, such as telangiectases and reticular veins, and varicose veins. The term chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) describes a condition that affects the venous system of the lower extremities with venous hypertension causing various pathologies including pain, swelling, edema, skin changes, and ulcerations. Although the term CVI is often used to exclude uncomplicated varicose veins, varicose veins have incompetent valves with increased venous pressure leading to progressive dilation and tortuosity. We will use the term CVI to represent the full spectrum of manifestations of chronic venous disease. Varicose veins have an estimated prevalence between 5% to 30% in the adult population, with a female to male predominance of 3 to 1, although a more recent study supports a higher male prevalence.1 The Edinburgh Vein Study screened 1566 subjects with duplex ultrasound for reflux finding CVI in 9.4% of men and 6.6% of women, after age adjustment, which rose significantly with age (21.2% in men 50 years old, and 12.0% in women 50 years old).2 The San Valentino Vascular Screening Project found among the 30 000 subjects evaluated by clinical assessment and duplex ultrasound a prevalence of 7% for varicose veins and 0.86% for “symptomatic” CVI.3 As in previous studies, CVI was more common with increasing age, but there was no significant sex difference. The rate of varicose vein development may be estimated from the Framingham Heart Study, which found an annual incidence of 2.6% in women and 1.9% in men.4 Risk factors found to be associated with CVI include age, sex, a family history of varicose veins, obesity, pregnancy, phlebitis, and previous leg injury.5,6 There also may be environmental or behavioral factors associated with CVI such as prolonged standing and perhaps a sitting posture at work.6,7 Varicose veins have a significant impact on healthcare resources, with millions of people seeking medical attention for their cosmetic appearance annually. Although often minimized, the cosmetic consequences may adversely affect an individual’s quality of life and are associated with other manifestations. The more serious consequences of CVI such as venous ulcers have an estimated prevalence of 0.3%, although active or healed ulcers are seen in 1% of the adult population.8 It has been estimated that 2.5 million people have CVI in the United States, and of those, 20% develop venous ulcers.9 The overall prognosis of venous ulcers is poor, with delayed healing and recurrent ulceration being common.10 More than 50% of venous ulcers require prolonged therapy lasting 1 year.5 The socioeconomic impact of venous ulceration is dramatic, resulting in an impaired ability to engage in social and occupational activities, thus reducing the quality of life and imposing financial constraints. Disability related to venous ulcers leads to loss of productive work hours, estimated at 2 million workdays/year, and may cause early retirement, which is found in up to 12.5% of workers with venous ulcers.11 The financial burden of venous ulcer disease on the healthcare system is readily apparent: An estimated $1 billion is spent annually on the treatment of chronic wounds in the United States, or up to 2% of the total healthcare budget in all Western countries, and recent estimates place the cost of venous ulcer care at $3 billion annually.12,13 Given the prevalence and socioeconomic impact of chronic venous disease, an understanding of the clinical manifestations, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic options is warranted. This article reviews the clinical aspects of CVI with a focus on the diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.113.006898

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

See all 757

Metadata

Authors
Eberhardt, R. T., & Raffetto, J. D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2014-07-22
Volume
130
Issue
4
Pages
333-346
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4251900443
Cited by
757
References
76
FWCI
28.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Venous Insufficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.113.006898
The paper
Eberhardt, R. T., & Raffetto, J. D. (2014). Chronic Venous Insufficiency. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.006898

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.