The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force–Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Contact force (CF) is a major determinant of lesion size and transmurality and has the potential to improve efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter that measures real-time CF in the treatment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results—: A total of 300 patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial and randomized to radiofrequency ablation with either a novel CF-sensing catheter or a non-CF catheter (control). The primary effectiveness end point consisted of acute electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins and freedom from recurrent symptomatic atrial arrhythmia off all antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. The primary safety end point included device-related serious adverse events. End points were powered to show noninferiority. All pulmonary veins were isolated in both groups. Effectiveness was achieved in 67.8% and 69.4% of subjects in the CF and control arms, respectively (absolute difference, −1.6%; lower limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, −10.7%; P =0.0073 for noninferiority). When the CF arm was stratified into optimal CF (≥90% ablations with ≥10 g) and nonoptimal CF groups, effectiveness was achieved in 75.9% versus 58.1%, respectively ( P =0.018). The primary safety end point occurred in 1.97% and 1.40% of CF patients and control subjects, respectively (absolute difference, 0.57%; upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 3.61%; P =0.0004 for noninferiority). Conclusions—: The CF ablation catheter met the primary safety and effectiveness end points. Additionally, optimal CF was associated with improved effectiveness. Clinical Trial Registration—: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01278953.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S.-A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., Kim, Y.-H., Klein, G., Natale, A., Packer, D., et al. (2010) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.109.859116 · Cited by 2,852 · cited 1×
“3%.(3,19,20) The recently published SMART-AF trial with another CF-sensing ablation catheter reported a higher cardiac tamponade rate of 2.”
Wazni, O. M., Marrouche, N. F., Martin, D. O., Verma, A., Bhargava, M., Saliba, W., Bash, D., Schweikert, R., Brachmann, J., Gunther, J., et al. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.21.2634 · Cited by 1,121
Morillo, C. A., Verma, A., Connolly, S. J., Kuck, K. H., Nair, G. M., Champagne, J., Sterns, L. D., Beresh, H., Healey, J. S., Natale, A., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.467 · Cited by 667
Self-citation
Cited by
Hindricks, G., Potpara, T., Dagres, N., Arbelo, E., Bax, J. J., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Boriani, G., Castella, M., Dan, G.-A., Dilaveris, P. E., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612 · Cited by 9,971
Self-citation2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies
Arbelo, E., Protonotarios, A., Gimeno, J. R., Arbustini, E., Barriales-Villa, R., Basso, C., Bezzina, C. R., Biagini, E., Blom, N. A., de Boer, R. A., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194 · Cited by 2,844
Calkins, H., Hindricks, G., Cappato, R., Kim, Y.-H., Saad, E. B., Aguinaga, L., Akar, J. G., Badhwar, V., Brugada, J., Camm, J., et al. (2017) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citationCalkins, H., Hindricks, G., Cappato, R., Kim, Y., Saad, E. B., Aguinaga, L., Akar, J. G., Badhwar, V., Brugada, J., Camm, J., et al. (2017) · Journal of Arrhythmia · doi:10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001 · Cited by 707
Self-citationKistler, P. M., Chieng, D., Sugumar, H., Ling, L.-H., Segan, L., Azzopardi, S., Al-Kaisey, A., Parameswaran, R., Anderson, R. D., Hawson, J., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.23722 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, V. Y., Dukkipati, S. R., Neuzil, P., Natale, A., Albenque, J.-P., Kautzner, J., Shah, D., Michaud, G., Wharton, M., Harari, D., Mahapatra, S., Lambert, H., & Mansour, M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2015-09-08
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 907-915
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2109227928
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 30.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force–Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014092
- The paper
- Reddy, V. Y., Dukkipati, S. R., Neuzil, P., Natale, A., Albenque, J.-P., Kautzner, J., Shah, D., Michaud, G., Wharton, M., Harari, D., Mahapatra, S., Lambert, H., & Mansour, M. (2015). Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force–Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.