Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival Prospects and Circumstances of Death in Contemporary Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Under Follow-Up at a Large Tertiary Centre

Open access
Diller, Gerhard-Paul, Kempny, Aleksander, Alonso-Gonzalez, Rafael, Swan, Lorna, Uebing, Anselm, Li, Wei, Babu-Narayan, Sonya, Wort, Stephen J., Dimopoulos, Konstantinos, Gatzoulis, Michael A.·2015·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients have ongoing morbidity and reduced long-term survival. Recently, the importance of specialized follow-up at tertiary ACHD centers has been highlighted. We aimed to assess survival prospects and clarify causes of death in a large cohort of patients at a single, tertiary center. Methods and Results—: We included 6969 adult patients (age 29.9±15.4 years) under follow-up at our institution between 1991 and 2013. Causes of death were ascertained from official death certificates. Survival was compared with the expected survival in the general age- and sex-matched population, and standardized mortality rates were calculated. Over a median follow-up time of 9.1 years (interquartile range, 5.2–14.5), 524 patients died. Leading causes of death were chronic heart failure (42%), pneumonia (10%), sudden-cardiac death (7%), cancer (6%), and hemorrhage (5%), whereas perioperative mortality was comparatively low. Isolated simple defects exhibited mortality rates similar to those in the general population, whereas patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, complex congenital heart disease, and Fontan physiology had much poorer long-term survival ( P <0.0001 for all). The probability of cardiac death decreased with increasing patient’s age, whereas the proportion of patients dying from noncardiac causes, such as cancer, increased. Conclusions—: ACHD patients continue to be afflicted by increased mortality in comparision with the general population as they grow older. Highest mortality rates were observed among patients with complex ACHD, Fontan physiology, and Eisenmenger syndrome. Our data provide an overview over causes of mortality and especially the spectrum of noncardiac causes of death in contemporary ACHD patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017202

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Diller, G.-P., Kempny, A., Alonso-Gonzalez, R., Swan, L., Uebing, A., Li, W., Babu-Narayan, S., Wort, S. J., Dimopoulos, K., & Gatzoulis, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2015-12
Volume
132
Issue
22
Pages
2118-2125
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2183371114
Cited by
639
References
3
FWCI
33.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival Prospects and Circumstances of Death in Contemporary Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Under Follow-Up at a Large Tertiary Centre. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.115.017202
The paper
Diller, G.-P., Kempny, A., Alonso-Gonzalez, R., Swan, L., Uebing, A., Li, W., Babu-Narayan, S., Wort, S. J., Dimopoulos, K., & Gatzoulis, M. A. (2015). Survival Prospects and Circumstances of Death in Contemporary Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Under Follow-Up at a Large Tertiary Centre. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.017202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.