Cited by 413Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsCongenital heart defects research

The spectrum of adult congenital heart disease in Europe: morbidity and mortality in a 5 year follow-up period

Open access
Engelfriet, Peter, Boersma, Eric, Oechslin, Erwin, Tijssen, Jan, Gatzoulis, Michael A., Thilén, Ulf, Kaemmerer, Harald, Moons, Philip +7 more·2005·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To describe clinical and demographic characteristics at baseline of a European cohort of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and to assess mortality and morbidity in a 5 year follow-up period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data collected as part of the Euro Heart Survey on adult CHD was analysed. This entailed information transcribed from the files of 4110 patients diagnosed with one of eight congenital heart conditions ('defects'), who consecutively visited the outpatient clinics of one of the participating centres in 1998. The patients were included retrospectively and followed until the end of 2003 for a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Notwithstanding their overall relatively good functional class and low mortality over the follow-up period, a considerable proportion of the patients had a history of endocarditis, arrhythmias, or vascular events. There were major differences between the eight defects, both in morbidity and regarding specific characteristics. Outcomes were worst in cyanotic defects and in the Fontan circulation, but a considerable proportion of the other patients also suffer from cardiac symptoms. In particular, arrhythmias are common. CONCLUSION: The spectrum of adult CHD in Europe emerging from this survey is one of a predominantly young population with substantial morbidity but relatively low mortality in a 5 year period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi396

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American College of Cardiology. Care of the adult with congenital heart disease. Presented at the 32nd Bethesda Conference, Bethesda, Maryland, 2-3 October 2000. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1161-1198.
  2. Therrien J, Warnes C, Daliento L, Hess J, Hoffmann A, Marelli A, Thilen U, Presbitero P, Perloff J, Somerville J, Webb GD. CCS Consensus Conference 2001 update: Recommendations for the management of adults with con- genital heart disease. Part III. Can J Cardiol 2001;17:1135-1158.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engelfriet, P., Boersma, E., Oechslin, E., Tijssen, J., Gatzoulis, M. A., Thilén, U., Kaemmerer, H., Moons, P., Meijboom, F., Popelová, J., Laforest, V., Hirsch, R., Daliento, L., Thaulow, E., & Mulder, B.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Engelfriet, Peter
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2005-07-04
Volume
26
Issue
21
Pages
2325-2333
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2103660790
Cited by
413
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
adult congenital heart disease, morbidity, mortality, cyanotic congenital heart disease, Fontan circulation, cardiac arrhythmias, infective endocarditis, vascular events, functional class, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Cardiovascular Agents, Data Collection, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review