Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factorial Effects of Evolocumab and Atorvastatin on Lipoprotein Metabolism

Watts, Gerald F., Chan, Dick C., Dent, Ricardo, Somaratne, Ransi, Wasserman, Scott M., Scott, Rob, Burrows, Sally, R. Barrett, P. Hugh·2017·Circulation

Abstract

Background: Monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9), such as evolocumab, lower plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentrations. Evolocumab is under investigation for its effects on cardiovascular outcomes in statin-treated, high-risk patients. The mechanism of action of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies on lipoprotein metabolism remains to be fully evaluated. Stable isotope tracer kinetics can effectively elucidate the mode of action of new lipid-regulating pharmacotherapies. Methods: We conducted a 2-by-2 factorial trial of the effects of atorvastatin (80 mg daily) and subcutaneous evolocumab (420 mg every 2 weeks) for 8 weeks on the plasma kinetics of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)–apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB), intermediate-density lipoprotein–apoB, and LDL-apoB in 81 healthy, normolipidemic, nonobese men. The kinetics of apoB in these lipoproteins was studied using a stable isotope infusion of D3-leucine, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and multicompartmental modeling. Results: Atorvastatin and evolocumab independently accelerated the fractional catabolism of VLDL-apoB ( P <0.001 and P .032, respectively), intermediate-density lipoprotein–apoB ( P =0.021 and P =.002, respectively), and LDL-apoB ( P <0.001, both interventions). Evolocumab but not atorvastatin decreased the production rate of intermediate-density lipoprotein–apoB ( P =0.043) and LDL-apoB ( P <0.001), which contributed to the reduction in the plasma pool sizes of these lipoprotein particles. The reduction in LDL-apoB and LDL-cholesterol concentrations was significantly greater with combination versus either monotherapy ( P <0.001). Whereas evolocumab but not atorvastatin lowered the concentration of free PCSK9, atorvastatin lowered the lathosterol/campesterol ratio (a measure of cholesterol synthesis/absorption) and apoC-III concentration. Both interventions decreased plasma apoE, but neither significantly altered lipoprotein lipase and cholesteryl ester protein mass or measures of insulin resistance. Conclusions: In healthy, normolipidemic subjects, evolocumab decreased the concentration of atherogenic lipoproteins, particularly LDL, by accelerating their catabolism. Reductions in intermediate-density lipoprotein and LDL production also contributed to the decrease in LDL particle concentration with evolocumab by a mechanism distinct from that of atorvastatin. These kinetic findings provide a metabolic basis for understanding the potential benefits of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies incremental to statins in on-going clinical end point trials. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02189837.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.116.025080

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)35728-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1194/jlr.R600017-JLR200 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.beem.2013.10.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301621 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.001 · DOI
  6. 10.2119/molmed.2014.00194 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.03.004 · DOI
  8. 10.1210/jcem.87.5.8455 · DOI
  9. 10.4161/mabs.28719 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38456-X · DOI
  11. 10.1056/NEJM198807073190105 · DOI
  12. 10.1161/01.ATV.16.6.794 · DOI
  13. 10.3892/ijmm.2010.559 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302670 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.3.E462 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.M710457200 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000133684.77013.88 · DOI
  18. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.194191 · DOI
  19. 10.1172/JCI109490 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/hep.1840080531 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802287 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37589-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.003125 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)33334-4 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.170530 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/00041433-200006000-00004 · DOI
  27. 10.1194/jlr.P029223 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu085 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006720 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.069 · DOI
  31. 10.7555/JBR.29.20150052 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Watts, G. F., Chan, D. C., Dent, R., Somaratne, R., Wasserman, S. M., Scott, R., Burrows, S., & R. Barrett, P. H.
Affiliations
From Lipid Disorders Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Australia (G.F.W.); School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Crawley (D.C.C., S.B., P.H.R.B.); Amgen Europe, Inc, Zug, Switzerland (R.D., R.S., S.M.W.); and Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (R. Scott).
Venue
Circulation
Published
2017-01-24
Volume
135
Issue
4
Pages
338-351
ISSN
  • 0009-7322
  • 1524-4539
Cited by
93
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review