Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An International, Multicentered, Evidence-Based Reappraisal of Genes Reported to Cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome

Open access
Adler, Arnon, Novelli, Valeria, Amin, Ahmad S., Abiusi, Emanuela, Care, Melanie, Nannenberg, Eline A., Feilotter, Harriet, Amenta, Simona, Mazza, Daniela, Bikker, Hennie, Sturm, Amy C., Garcia, John, Ackerman, Michael J., Hershberger, Raymond E., Perez, Marco V., Zareba, Wojciech, Ware, James S., Wilde, Arthur A.M., Gollob, Michael H.·2020·Circulation

Abstract

Background: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is the first described and most common inherited arrhythmia. Over the last 25 years, multiple genes have been reported to cause this condition and are routinely tested in patients. Because of dramatic changes in our understanding of human genetic variation, reappraisal of reported genetic causes for LQTS is required. Methods: Utilizing an evidence-based framework, 3 gene curation teams blinded to each other’s work scored the level of evidence for 17 genes reported to cause LQTS. A Clinical Domain Channelopathy Working Group provided a final classification of these genes for causation of LQTS after assessment of the evidence scored by the independent curation teams. Results: Of 17 genes reported as being causative for LQTS, 9 ( AKAP9, ANK2, CAV3, KCNE1, KCNE2, KCNJ2, KCNJ5, SCN4B, SNTA1 ) were classified as having limited or disputed evidence as LQTS-causative genes. Only 3 genes ( KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A ) were curated as definitive genes for typical LQTS. Another 4 genes ( CALM1, CALM2, CALM3, TRDN ) were found to have strong or definitive evidence for causality in LQTS with atypical features, including neonatal atrioventricular block. The remaining gene ( CACNA1C ) had moderate level evidence for causing LQTS. Conclusions: More than half of the genes reported as causing LQTS have limited or disputed evidence to support their disease causation. Genetic variants in these genes should not be used for clinical decision-making, unless accompanied by new and sufficient genetic evidence. The findings of insufficient evidence to support gene-disease associations may extend to other disciplines of medicine and warrants a contemporary evidence-based evaluation for previously reported disease-causing genes to ensure their appropriate use in precision medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.119.043132

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Adler, A., Novelli, V., Amin, A. S., Abiusi, E., Care, M., Nannenberg, E. A., Feilotter, H., Amenta, S., Mazza, D., Bikker, H., Sturm, A. C., Garcia, J., Ackerman, M. J., Hershberger, R. E., Perez, M. V., Zareba, W., Ware, J. S., Wilde, A. A. M., & Gollob, M. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2020-02-11
Volume
141
Issue
6
Pages
418-428
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W3003054269
Cited by
394
References
39
FWCI
32.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An International, Multicentered, Evidence-Based Reappraisal of Genes Reported to Cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.119.043132
The paper
Adler, A., Novelli, V., Amin, A. S., Abiusi, E., Care, M., Nannenberg, E. A., Feilotter, H., Amenta, S., Mazza, D., Bikker, H., Sturm, A. C., Garcia, J., Ackerman, M. J., Hershberger, R. E., Perez, M. V., Zareba, W., Ware, J. S., Wilde, A. A. M., & Gollob, M. H. (2020). An International, Multicentered, Evidence-Based Reappraisal of Genes Reported to Cause Congenital Long QT Syndrome. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.119.043132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.