The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Insights From the SHaRe Registry
Abstract
Background: The term “end stage” has been used to describe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as occurring when left ventricular ejection fraction is <50%. The prognosis of HCM-LVSD has reportedly been poor, but because of its relative rarity, the natural history remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Data from 11 high-volume HCM specialty centers making up the international SHaRe Registry (Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry) were used to describe the natural history of patients with HCM-LVSD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of prognosis and incident development. Results: From a cohort of 6793 patients with HCM, 553 (8%) met the criteria for HCM-LVSD. Overall, 75% of patients with HCM-LVSD experienced clinically relevant events, and 35% met the composite outcome (all-cause death [n=128], cardiac transplantation [n=55], or left ventricular assist device implantation [n=9]). After recognition of HCM-LVSD, the median time to composite outcome was 8.4 years. However, there was substantial individual variation in natural history. Significant predictors of the composite outcome included the presence of multiple pathogenic/likely pathogenic sarcomeric variants (hazard ratio [HR], 5.6 [95% CI, 2.3–13.5]), atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.7–3.5]), and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (HR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.3–2.8]). The incidence of new HCM-LVSD was ≈7.5% over 15 years. Significant predictors of developing incident HCM-LVSD included greater left ventricular cavity size (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0–1.3] and wall thickness (HR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1–1.4]), left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% to 60% (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2, 2.8]–2.8 [95% CI, 1.8–4.2]) at baseline evaluation, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.0–4.9]), and the presence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic sarcomeric variant, particularly in thin filament genes (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0–2.1] and 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2–5.1], respectively). Conclusions: HCM-LVSD affects ≈8% of patients with HCM. Although the natural history of HCM-LVSD was variable, 75% of patients experienced adverse events, including 35% experiencing a death equivalent an estimated median time of 8.4 years after developing systolic dysfunction. In addition to clinical features, genetic substrate appears to play a role in both prognosis (multiple sarcomeric variants) and the risk for incident development of HCM-LVSD (thin filament variants).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Left ventricular dysfunction, which for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is considered to be ejection fraction <50%, is present in 8% of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and is associated with adverse outcomes, particularly in those with sarcomeric variants.”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [106]
In the citing paper
“Left ventricular dysfunction is uncommon, developing in 7.5% over 15 years, but once this occurs 35% progress to death, transplant, or mechanical assist device over median of 8.4 years, as shown in a cohort of more than 6500 patients in the SHARE registry”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R., & Holford, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 · Cited by 2,154
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu284 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e230 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/gim.2014.205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/hrt.2003.031161 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583500 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90998-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.083 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003090 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.062 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001843 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.026 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0084 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.0000162460.36735.71 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10554-019-01563-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062123 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1057 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ommen, S. R., Ho, C. Y., Asif, I. M., Balaji, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Dearani, J. A., Epps, K. C., Evanovich, L., Ferrari, V. A., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001250 · Cited by 807
Self-citationWriting Committee Members, Ommen, S. R., Mital, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A., Elliott, P., Evanovich, L. L., Hung, J., Joglar, J. A., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000938 · Cited by 336
Self-citationCurrent management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Sikand, N., Stendahl, J., Sen, S., Lampert, R., & Day, S. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077274 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marstrand, P., Han, L., Day, S. M., Olivotto, I., Ashley, E. A., Michels, M., Pereira, A. C., Wittekind, S. G., Helms, A., Saberi, S., Jacoby, D., Ware, J. S., Colan, S. D., Semsarian, C., Ingles, J., Lakdawala, N. K., Ho, C. Y., & For the SHaRe Investigators
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1371-1383
- ISSN
- 0009-7322
- 1524-4539
- PMC
- PMC7182243
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review