Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acute COVID-19 and the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction

Open access
Modin, Daniel, Claggett, Brian, Sindet-Pedersen, Caroline, Lassen, Mats Christian Højbjerg, Skaarup, Kristoffer Grundtvig, Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr, Fralick, Michael, Schou, Morten, Lamberts, Morten, Gerds, Thomas, Fosbøl, Emil Loldrup, Phelps, Matthew, Kragholm, Kristian Hay, Andersen, Mikkel Porsborg, Køber, Lars, Torp-Pedersen, Christian, Solomon, Scott D., Gislason, Gunnar, Biering-Sørensen, Tor·2020·Circulation

Abstract

◼ myocardial infarction ◼ stroke R ecent studies have linked coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection with an increased risk of ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).1,2 However, the evidence base is small and current data are limited mainly to case reports and 2 cohort studies.[1][2][3][4] Therefore, in a nationwide registerbased study considering all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at Danish hospitals, we assessed the association between COVID-19 infection and the risk of ischemic stroke and AMI during the acute phase of infection using the self-controlled case series method.5 We used Danish nationwide registers to identify all patients diagnosed at Danish hospitals with a positive test for COVID-19 infection up to July 16, 2020 (International Classification of Diseases-10 codes: B342, B342A, B972, B972A).From this population, we identified all patients who were admitted to the hospital with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of first-ever ischemic stroke (International Classification of Diseases-10 codes: I63 through I66) or first-ever AMI (International Classification of Diseases-10 code: I21) up to 180 days before COVID-19 diagnosis and until the end of available data (July 16, 2020).If a patient experienced >1 outcome during the observation period, only the first was considered.We based our statistical analysis on the self-controlled case series design.5 This design is ideal for assessing the effect of transient exposures such as infections, because each patient acts as his or her own control.Consequently, all confounders, even if unmeasured, are natively controlled for as long as they do not vary within the observation period.5 We defined the risk interval as the 14 days after the date of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis.The control interval was defined as up to 180 days before COVID-19 diagnosis and until the end of available data (July 16, 2020), excluding the risk interval.The date of COVID-19 diagnosis was used as the index date for defining the exposure.The relative incidence of AMI and ischemic stroke associated with the risk interval was calculated using a conditional Poisson regression model comparing the incidence within the risk interval with the incidence in the control interval.5 We conducted several sensitivity analyses to ascertain the robustness of our results, including controlling for calendar time in 3-month bands, varying the risk interval, varying the control interval, introducing preexposure periods, and restricting the analysis to only consider the time period after the first case of confirmed CO-VID-19 infection was diagnosed in Denmark (February 27, 2020; Table).According to Danish law, purely register-based studies do not require informed consent or approval by an ethics review board.The data used for this study are governed by The Danish Health Data Authority and Statistics Denmark and cannot be made available on request by the authors.Access to the data may only be provided through direct submission of a formal request to these agencies.A total of 5119 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at Danish hospitals were identified.A total of 1945 patients (38%) had received an inpatient diagnosis

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.120.050809

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Modin, D., Claggett, B., Sindet-Pedersen, C., Lassen, M. C. H., Skaarup, K. G., Jensen, J. U. S., Fralick, M., Schou, M., Lamberts, M., Gerds, T., Fosbøl, E. L., Phelps, M., Kragholm, K. H., Andersen, M. P., Køber, L., Torp-Pedersen, C., Solomon, S. D., Gislason, G., & Biering-Sørensen, T.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2020-11-24
Volume
142
Issue
21
Pages
2080-2082
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W3093404624
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute COVID-19 and the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.120.050809
The paper
Modin, D., Claggett, B., Sindet-Pedersen, C., Lassen, M. C. H., Skaarup, K. G., Jensen, J. U. S., Fralick, M., Schou, M., Lamberts, M., Gerds, T., Fosbøl, E. L., Phelps, M., Kragholm, K. H., Andersen, M. P., Køber, L., Torp-Pedersen, C., Solomon, S. D., Gislason, G., & Biering-Sørensen, T. (2020). Acute COVID-19 and the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke and Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.050809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.