Cited by 86Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Blinded Withdrawal of Long-Term Randomized Treatment With Empagliflozin or Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure

Open access
Packer, Milton, Butler, Javed, Zeller, Cordula, Pocock, Stuart J., Brueckmann, Martina, Ferreira, João Pedro, Filippatos, Gerasimos, Usman, Muhammad Shariq +2 more·2023·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure persist after years of therapy. METHODS: In the EMPEROR-Reduced (Empagliflozin Outcome Trials in Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) and EMPEROR-Preserved (Empagliflozin Outcome Trials in Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) trials, patients with heart failure were randomly assigned (double-blind) to placebo or empagliflozin 10 mg/day for a median of 16 and 26 months, respectively. At the end of the trials, 6799 patients (placebo 3381, empagliflozin 3418) were prospectively withdrawn from treatment in a blinded manner, and, of these, 3981 patients (placebo 2020, empagliflozin 1961) underwent prespecified in-person assessments after ≈30 days off treatment. RESULTS: From 90 days from the start of closeout to the end of double-blind treatment, the annualized risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was lower in empagliflozin-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (10.7 [95% CI, 9.0–12.6] versus 13.5 [95% CI, 11.5–15.6] events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI, 0.60–0.96]). When the study drugs were withdrawn for ≈30 days, the annualized risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure increased in patients withdrawn from empagliflozin but not in those withdrawn from placebo (17.0 [95% CI, 12.6–22.1] versus 14.1 [95% CI, 10.1–18.8] events per 100 patient-years for empagliflozin and placebo, respectively). The hazard ratio for the change in risk in the patients withdrawn from empagliflozin was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.20–2.54), P =0.0034, whereas the change in the risk in patients withdrawn from placebo was not significant (hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI, 0.76–1.66]); time period-by-treatment interaction, P =0.068. After withdrawal, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score declined by 1.6±0.4 in patients withdrawn from empagliflozin versus placebo ( P <0.0001). Furthermore, withdrawal of empagliflozin was accompanied by increases in fasting glucose, body weight, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide, uric acid, and serum bicarbonate and decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit (all P <0.01). These physiological and laboratory changes were the inverse of the effects of the drug seen at the start of the trials during the initiation of treatment (≈1–3 years earlier) in the same cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These observations demonstrate a persistent effect of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure even after years of treatment, which dissipated rapidly after withdrawal of the drug. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT03057977 and NCT03057951.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.123.065748

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1]Vaduganathan M Claggett BL Inciardi RM Fonarow GC McMurray JJV Solomon SD. Estimating the benefits of combination medical therapy in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2022; 145: 1741– 1743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058929 35603667 · DOI
  2. [3]Packer M Medina N Yushak M. Role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of hemodynamic and clinical tolerance to long-term prazosin therapy in patients with severe chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7: 671– 680. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80479-x 2869077 · DOI
  3. [4]Colucci WS Alexander RW Williams GH Rude RE Holman BL Konstam MA Wynne J Mudge GH Jr Braunwald E. Decreased lymphocyte beta-adrenergic-receptor density in patients with heart failure and tolerance to the beta-adrenergic agonist pirbuterol. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305: 185– 190. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198107233050402 6113543 · DOI
  4. [5]Packer M Lee WH Kessler PD Gottlieb SS Medina N Yushak M. Prevention and reversal of nitrate tolerance in patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 799– 804. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709243171304 3114637 · DOI
  5. [6]Packer M Meller J Medina N Yushak M Gorlin R. Hemodynamic characterization of tolerance to long-term hydralazine therapy in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1982; 306: 57– 62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198201143060201 7053487 · DOI
  6. [9]Chen Y Qiu Z Jiang J Su X Huang F Tang J Jin W. Outcomes of spironolactone withdrawal in dilated cardiomyopathy with improved ejection fraction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 1080. PMC8481596 34604354
  7. [10]Gilstrap LG Fonarow GC Desai AS Liang L Matsouaka R DeVore AD Smith EE Heidenreich P Hernandez AF Yancy CW. Initiation, continuation, or withdrawal of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6: e004675. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004675 28189999 PMC5523765 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Amin OA Alaarag AF. The impact of discontinuation of sacubitril–valsartan and shifting to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Anatol J Cardiol. 2021; 25: 163– 169. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.39267 33690130 PMC8114728 · DOI
  9. [12]Packer M Pitt B Rouleau JL Swedberg K DeMets DL Fisher L. Long-term effects of flosequinan on the morbidity and mortality of patients with severe chronic heart failure: primary results of the PROFILE trial after 24 years. JACC Heart Fail. 2017; 5: 399– 407. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.03.003 28501522 · DOI
  10. [14]Halliday BP Wassall R Lota AS Khalique Z Gregson J Newsome S Jackson R Rahneva T Wage R Smith G. Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019; 393: 61– 73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32484-X 30429050 PMC6319251 · DOI
  11. [15]Boorsma EM Beusekamp JC Ter Maaten JM Figarska SM Danser AHJ van Veldhuisen DJ van der Meer P Heerspink HJL Damman K Voors AA. Effects of empagliflozin on renal sodium and glucose handling in patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021; 23: 68– 78. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2066 33251643 PMC8048437 · DOI
  12. [16]Scholtes RA Muskiet MHA van Baar MJB Hesp AC Greasley PJ Hammarstedt A Karlsson C Hallow KM Danser AHJ Heerspink HJL. The adaptive renal response for volume homeostasis during 2 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment in people with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function on a sodium-controlled diet. Kidney Int Rep. 2022; 7: 1084– 1092. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.02.023 35570989 PMC9091605 · DOI
  13. [18]van Ruiten CC Smits MM Kok MD Serné EH van Raalte DH Kramer MHH Nieuwdorp M IJzerman RG. Mechanisms underlying the blood pressure lowering effects of dapagliflozin, exenatide, and their combination in people with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022; 21: 63. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01492-x 35484607 PMC9052512 · DOI
  14. [19]Tanaka H Takano K Iijima H Kubo H Maruyama N Hashimoto T Arakawa K Togo M Inagaki N Kaku K. Factors affecting canagliflozin-induced transient urine volume increase in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2017; 34: 436– 451. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0457-8 27981497 PMC5331075 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [20]Heise T Jordan J Wanner C Heer M Macha S Mattheus M Lund SS Woerle HJ Broedl UC. Acute pharmacodynamic effects of empagliflozin with and without diuretic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2016; 38: 2248– 2264.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.08.008 27666126 · DOI
  16. [21]Anker SD Butler J Filippatos G Ferreira JP Bocchi E Böhm M Brunner-La Rocca HP Choi DJ Chopra V Chuquiure-Valenzuela E; EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385: 1451– 1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 34449189 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [23]Packer M Butler J Filippatos G Zannad F Ferreira JP Zeller C Brueckmann M Jamal W Pocock SJ Anker SD; EMPEROR Trial Committees and Investigators. Design of a prospective patient-level pooled analysis of two parallel trials of empagliflozin in patients with established heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020; 22: 2393– 2398. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2065 33251659 PMC7898542 · DOI
  18. [24]Pocock SJ Ferreira JP Gregson J Anker SD Butler J Filippatos G Gollop ND Iwata T Brueckmann M Januzzi JL. Novel biomarker-driven prognostic models to predict morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure: the EMPEROR-Reduced trial. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 4455– 4464. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab579 34423361 PMC8599073 · DOI
  19. [25]Pocock SJ Ferreira JP Packer M Zannad F Filippatos G Kondo T McMurray JJV Solomon SD Januzzi JL Iwata T. Biomarker-driven prognostic models in chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022; 24: 1869– 1878. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2607 35796209 PMC9796853 · DOI
  20. [28]Borges-Júnior FA Silva Dos Santos D Benetti A Polidoro JZ Wisnivesky ACT Crajoinas RO Antônio EL Jensen L Caramelli B Malnic G. Empagliflozin inhibits proximal tubule NHE3 activity, preserves GFR, and restores euvolemia in nondiabetic rats with induced heart failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32: 1616– 1629. 33846238 PMC8425656
  21. [29]Onishi A Fu Y Patel R Darshi M Crespo-Masip M Huang W Song P Freeman B Kim YC Soleimani M. A role for tubular Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 in the natriuretic effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020; 319: F712– F728. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00264.2020 32893663 PMC7642886 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [31]Novikov A Fu Y Huang W Freeman B Patel R van Ginkel C Koepsell H Busslinger M Onishi A Nespoux J. SGLT2 inhibition and renal urate excretion: role of luminal glucose, GLUT9, and URAT1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019; 316: F173– F185. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00462.2018 30427222 PMC6383194 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [32]Segar MW Kolkailah AA Frederich R Pong A Cannon CP Cosentino F Dagogo-Jack S McGuire DK Pratley RE Liu CC. Mediators of ertugliflozin effects on heart failure and kidney outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022; 24: 1829– 1839. doi: 10.1111/dom.14769 35603908 PMC9357198 · DOI
  24. [34]Poursharif S Hamza S Braam B. Changes in proximal tubular reabsorption modulate microvascular regulation via the TGF system. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23: 11203. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911203 36232506 PMC9569689 · DOI
  25. [35]Op den Kamp YJM de Ligt M Dautzenberg B Kornips E Esterline R Hesselink MKC Hoeks J Schrauwen-Hinderling VB Havekes B Oscarsson J. Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on energy metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44: 1334– 1343. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2887 33858855 PMC8247491 · DOI
  26. [36]Yamada T Sakaguchi K Okada Y Miura H Otowa-Suematsu N So A Komada H Hirota Y Ohara T Kuroki Y. Analysis of time-dependent alterations of parameters related to erythrocytes after ipragliflozin initiation. Diabetol Int. 2020; 12: 197– 206. doi: 10.1007/s13340-020-00474-2 33786274 PMC7943693 · DOI
  27. [37]Fuchs Andersen C Omar M Glenthøj A El Fassi D Møller HJ Lindholm Kurtzhals JA Styrishave B Kistorp C Tuxen C Poulsen MK. Effects of empagliflozin on erythropoiesis in heart failure: data from the Empire HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022; 25: 226– 234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2735 36377106 · DOI
  28. [39]Packer M Meller J Medina N Gorlin R Herman MV. Rebound hemodynamic events after the abrupt withdrawal of nitroprusside in patients with severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301: 1193– 1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197911293012201 503111 · DOI
  29. [40]Missouris CG MacGregor GA. Rebound sodium and water retention occurs when diuretic treatment is stopped. BMJ. 1998; 316: 628. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.628a PMC1112648 9518931 · DOI
  30. [41]Hollenberg NK. Set point for sodium homeostasis: surfeit, deficit, and their implications. Kidney Int. 1980; 17: 423– 429. doi: 10.1038/ki.1980.50 7392417 · DOI
  31. [42]Packer M Meller J Medina N Yushak M Gorlin R. Determinants of drug response in severe chronic heart failure. 1. Activation of vasoconstrictor forces during vasodilator therapy. Circulation. 1981; 64: 506– 514. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.3.506 7261283 · DOI
  32. [43]Packer M Gheorghiade M Young JB Costantini PJ Adams KF Cody RJ Smith LK Van Voorhees L Gourley LA Jolly MK. Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. RADIANCE Study. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1– 7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307013290101 8505940 · DOI
  33. [44]Pflugfelder PW Baird MG Tonkon MJ DiBianco R Pitt B. Clinical consequences of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor withdrawal in chronic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quinapril. The Quinapril Heart Failure Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1557– 1563. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90578-o 8227822 · DOI

Authors
Packer, M., Butler, J., Zeller, C., Pocock, S. J., Brueckmann, M., Ferreira, J. P., Filippatos, G., Usman, M. S., Zannad, F., & Anker, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (DE)
Corresponding author
Packer, Milton
Venue
Circulation
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
148
Issue
13
Pages
1011-1022
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4386152632
Cited by
86
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 2
FWCI
16.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (N/A)
  • Eli Lilly & Company (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
empagliflozin, SGLT2 inhibitors, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, EMPEROR-Reduced, EMPEROR-Preserved, reduced ejection fraction, preserved ejection fraction, drug discontinuation, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Benzhydryl Compounds, Double-Blind Method, Glucosides, Heart Failure, Humans, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review