Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 645

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Simons, Michael, Annex, Brian H., Laham, Roger J., Kleiman, Neal, Henry, Timothy, Dauerman, Harold, Udelson, James E., Gervino, Ernesto V., Pike, Marilyn, Whitehouse, M.J., Moon, Thomas, Chronos, Nicolas A.·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Single-bolus intracoronary administration of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) improved symptoms and myocardial function in a phase I, open-label trial in patients with coronary artery disease. We conducted the FGF Initiating RevaScularization Trial (FIRST) to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of recombinant FGF2 (rFGF2). Methods and Results— FIRST is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 at 0, 0.3, 3, or 30 μg/kg (n=337 patients). Efficacy was evaluated at 90 and 180 days by exercise tolerance test, myocardial nuclear perfusion imaging, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Exercise tolerance was increased at 90 days in all groups and was not significantly different between placebo and FGF-treated groups. rFGF2 reduced angina symptoms as measured by the angina frequency score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (overall P =0.035) and the physical component summary scale of the Short-Form 36 (pairwise P =0.033, all FGF groups versus placebo). These differences were more pronounced in highly symptomatic patients (baseline angina frequency score ≤40 or Canadian Cardiovascular Society score of III or IV). None of the differences were significant at 180 days because of continued improvement in the placebo group. Adverse events were similar across all groups, except for hypotension, which occurred with higher frequency in the 30-μg/kg rFGF2 group. Conclusions— A single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 does not improve exercise tolerance or myocardial perfusion but does show trends toward symptomatic improvement at 90 (but not 180) days.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc0802.104407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 645

Metadata

Authors
Simons, M., Annex, B. H., Laham, R. J., Kleiman, N., Henry, T., Dauerman, H., Udelson, J. E., Gervino, E. V., Pike, M., Whitehouse, M. J., Moon, T., & Chronos, N. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-02-19
Volume
105
Issue
7
Pages
788-793
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2138369468
Cited by
645
References
0
FWCI
50.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc0802.104407
The paper
Simons, M., Annex, B. H., Laham, R. J., Kleiman, N., Henry, T., Dauerman, H., Udelson, J. E., Gervino, E. V., Pike, M., Whitehouse, M. J., Moon, T., & Chronos, N. A. (2002). Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0802.104407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.