The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background— Single-bolus intracoronary administration of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) improved symptoms and myocardial function in a phase I, open-label trial in patients with coronary artery disease. We conducted the FGF Initiating RevaScularization Trial (FIRST) to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of recombinant FGF2 (rFGF2). Methods and Results— FIRST is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 at 0, 0.3, 3, or 30 μg/kg (n=337 patients). Efficacy was evaluated at 90 and 180 days by exercise tolerance test, myocardial nuclear perfusion imaging, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Exercise tolerance was increased at 90 days in all groups and was not significantly different between placebo and FGF-treated groups. rFGF2 reduced angina symptoms as measured by the angina frequency score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (overall P =0.035) and the physical component summary scale of the Short-Form 36 (pairwise P =0.033, all FGF groups versus placebo). These differences were more pronounced in highly symptomatic patients (baseline angina frequency score ≤40 or Canadian Cardiovascular Society score of III or IV). None of the differences were significant at 180 days because of continued improvement in the placebo group. Adverse events were similar across all groups, except for hypotension, which occurred with higher frequency in the 30-μg/kg rFGF2 group. Conclusions— A single intracoronary infusion of rFGF2 does not improve exercise tolerance or myocardial perfusion but does show trends toward symptomatic improvement at 90 (but not 180) days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors by human adipose stromal cells
Rehman, J., Traktuev, D., Li, J., Merfeld-Clauss, S., Temm-Grove, C. J., Bovenkerk, J. E., Pell, C. L., Johnstone, B. H., Considine, R. V., & March, K. L. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000121425.42966.f1 · Cited by 2,269
The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy
Beenken, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2792 · Cited by 1,945
Kinnaird, T., Stabile, E., Burnett, M. S., Lee, C. W., Barr, S., Fuchs, S., & Epstein, S. E. (2004) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000118601.37875.ac · Cited by 1,415
FGF/FGFR signaling in health and disease
Xie, Y., Su, N., Yang, J., Tan, Q., Huang, S., Jin, M., Ni, Z., Zhang, B., Zhang, D., Luo, F., et al. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00222-7 · Cited by 904
Cao, R., Bråkenhielm, E., Pawliuk, R., Wariaro, D., Post, M. J., Wahlberg, E., Leboulch, P., & Cao, Y. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm848 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Simons, M., Annex, B. H., Laham, R. J., Kleiman, N., Henry, T., Dauerman, H., Udelson, J. E., Gervino, E. V., Pike, M., Whitehouse, M. J., Moon, T., & Chronos, N. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-02-19
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 788-793
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2138369468
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc0802.104407
- The paper
- Simons, M., Annex, B. H., Laham, R. J., Kleiman, N., Henry, T., Dauerman, H., Udelson, J. E., Gervino, E. V., Pike, M., Whitehouse, M. J., Moon, T., & Chronos, N. A. (2002). Pharmacological Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease With Recombinant Fibroblast Growth Factor-2: Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0802.104407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.