The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive Quantification of the Contractile Reserve of Stunned Myocardium by Ultrasonic Strain Rate and Strain
Open accessAbstract
Background We sought to investigate ultrasonic strain rate and strain as new indices to quantify the contractile reserve of stunned myocardium during dobutamine infusion. Methods and Results Stunning of the left ventricular posterior wall was induced in 9 closed-chest pigs after 30 minutes of severe hypoperfusion followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion of the left circumflex coronary artery territory. A second group of 7 animals had no coronary occlusion and served as normal controls. An incremental dobutamine infusion protocol was used in both groups. Changes in regional radial function were monitored by use of ultrasound-derived maximal systolic radial strain rate (SR) and systolic strain (ε). In the control group, dobutamine induced an increase in both SR and maximal dP/dt, which correlated linearly ( r =0.85). Conversely, ε values increased at low doses of dobutamine (2.5 to 5 μg · kg −1 · min −1 ) but decreased during higher infusion rates (10 to 20 μg · kg −1 · min −1 ). During circumflex hypoperfusion, SR and ε of the posterior wall decreased from 5.0±0.3 s −1 and 63±6% to 2.9±0.3 s −1 and 27±4%, respectively ( P <0.01). After 60 minutes of reperfusion, SR and ε failed to fully resume because of stunning, averaging 3.6±0.2 s −1 and 35±3%, respectively ( P =0.12 versus ischemia, P <0.05 versus baseline). During dobutamine infusion, SR increased at 5 μg · kg −1 · min −1 and exceeded baseline values at 20 μg · kg −1 · min −1 ( P <0.05), whereas ε increased only at high doses and remained below baseline levels ( P <0.05). Conclusions The changes in regional function of stunned myocardium during inotropic stimulation could be characterized by use of ultrasonic deformation parameters. During dobutamine infusion, strain-rate values quantified the contractile reserve better than strain values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mor-Avi, V., Lang, R. M., Badano, L. P., Belohlavek, M., Cardim, N. M., Derumeaux, G., Galderisi, M., Marwick, T., Nagueh, S. F., Sengupta, P. P., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015 · Cited by 1,254
Persistent and reversible cardiac dysfunction among amateur marathon runners
Neilan, T. G., Yoerger, D. M., Douglas, P. S., Marshall, J. E., Halpern, E. F., Lawlor, D., Picard, M. H., & Wood, M. J. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi813 · Cited by 206
Bartko, P. E., Heinze, G., Graf, S., Clavel, M.-A., Khorsand, A., Bergler-Klein, J., Burwash, I. G., Dumesnil, J. G., Sénéchal, M., Baumgartner, H., et al. (2013) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.112.980201 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Jamal, F., Strotmann, J., Weidemann, F., Kukulski, T., D’hooge, J., Bijnens, B., Van de Werf, F., De Scheerder, I., & Sutherland, G. R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-08-28
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1059-1065
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2166606625
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Quantification of the Contractile Reserve of Stunned Myocardium by Ultrasonic Strain Rate and Strain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc3501.093818
- The paper
- Jamal, F., Strotmann, J., Weidemann, F., Kukulski, T., D’hooge, J., Bijnens, B., Van de Werf, F., De Scheerder, I., & Sutherland, G. R. (2001). Noninvasive Quantification of the Contractile Reserve of Stunned Myocardium by Ultrasonic Strain Rate and Strain. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc3501.093818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.