Cited by 206Cardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Persistent and reversible cardiac dysfunction among amateur marathon runners

Neilan, Tomas G., Yoerger, Danita M., Douglas, Pamela S., Marshall, Jane E., Halpern, Elkan F., Lawlor, David, Picard, Michael H., Wood, Malissa J.·2006·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Aims Transient systolic and diastolic abnormalities in ventricular function have previously been documented during endurance sports. However, these described alterations may be limited by the techniques applied. We sought, using less load-dependent methods, to characterize both the extent and the chronology of the cardiac changes associated with endurance events. Methods and results Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed prior to, immediately after, and approximately 1 month after completion of the 2003 Boston Marathon in 20 amateur athletes. TTE included two-dimensional, spectral and tissue Doppler (TD) and flow propagation velocity (V(p)). After completion of the marathon, global measures of left ventricular (LV) systolic function were unchanged (EF 59 +/- 6 vs. 61 +/- 4% post, P = 0.14), whereas TD-derived measures of LV systolic function [septal strain -23 +/- 5 vs. -17 +/- 4%, P = 0.007; septal strain rate (SR) -1.5 +/- 0.3 vs. -1.1+/- 0.2 s(-1), P = 0.007] and right ventricular (RV) systolic function (RV apical strain -33 +/- 4 vs. -27 +/- 5%, P = 0.001; RV apical SR -2.4 +/- 0.7 vs. -1.8 +/- 0.5, P = 0.002) were reduced. Significant changes in transmitral velocity (E/A ratio 2.0 +/- 0.5 vs.1.3 +/- 0.3, P = 0.005) and TD indices of LV and RV diastolic function (E(a) septal 9.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.2 cm/s post-marathon, P = 0.01) were also observed, indicating an inherent alteration in LV relaxation. Although all indices of LV and RV systolic function had re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi813

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neilan, T. G., Yoerger, D. M., Douglas, P. S., Marshall, J. E., Halpern, E. F., Lawlor, D., Picard, M. H., & Wood, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Malissa J.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2006-03-22
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1079-1084
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2127740045
Cited by
206
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
marathon running, endurance exercise, cardiac dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, right ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular systolic function, right ventricular systolic function, tissue Doppler imaging, transmitral flow velocity, recreational athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Running, Stroke Volume, Systole, Observer Variation, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review