Cited by 295Cardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

In Vivo Myocardial Protection From Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by the Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-γ Agonist Rosiglitazone

Yue, Tian-li, Chen, Jun, Bao, Weike, Narayanan, Padma K., Bril, Antoine, Jiang, Wen, Lysko, Paul G., Gu, Juan-Li +5 more·2001·Circulation

Abstract

BackgroundDiabetes is associated with increased risk of mortality as a consequence of acute myocardial infarction. This study determined whether rosiglitazone (ROSI) could reduce myocardial infarction after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Methods and ResultsMale Lewis rats were anesthetized, and the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated for 30 minutes. After reperfusion for 24 hours, the ischemic and infarct sizes were determined. ROSI at 1 and 3 mg/kg IV reduced infarct size by 30% and 37%, respectively (P<0.01 versus vehicle). Pretreatment with ROSI (3 mg · kg−1· d−1 PO) for 7 days also reduced infarct size by 24% (P<0.01). ROSI also improved ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial contractile dysfunction. Left ventricular systolic pressure and positive and negative maximal values of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) were significantly improved in ROSI-treated rats. ROSI reduced the accumulation of neutrophils and macrophages in the ischemic heart by 40% and 43%, respectively (P<0.01). Ischemia/reperfusion induced upregulation of CD11b/CD18 and downregulation of L-selectin on neutrophils and monocytes; these effects were significantly attenuated in ROSI-treated animals. Likewise, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in ischemic hearts was markedly diminished by ROSI, as was the ischemia/reperfusion-stimulated upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. ConclusionsROSI reduced myocardial infarction and improved contractile dysfunction caused by ischemia/reperfusion injury. The cardioprotective effect of ROSI was most likely due to inhibition of the inflammatory response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc4601.099403

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in nondiabetic rats have shown a positive benefit of TZD treatment upon ischemia/reperfusion, although this has not been shown to be true for other models such as pigs.

    “Studies in nondiabetic rats have also shown a positive benefit of TZD treatment upon ischemia/reperfusion (158, 176, 390), although this has not been shown to be true for other models such as pigs (380).”

    From Cardiac remodeling in obesity (2008) · cites this paper as [390]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yue, T.-L., Chen, J., Bao, W., Narayanan, P. K., Bril, A., Jiang, W., Lysko, P. G., Gu, J.-L., Boyce, R., Zimmerman, D. M., Hart, T. K., Buckingham, R. E., & Ohlstein, E. H.
Affiliations
  • From the Departments of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (T.Y., J.C., W.B., A.B., W.J., P.G.L., J.G., R.E.B., E.H.O.) and Safety Assessment (P.K.N., R.B., D.M.Z., T.K.H.), GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pa.
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-11-20
Volume
104
Issue
21
Pages
2588-2594
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2102772338
Cited by
295
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
rosiglitazone, PPARγ agonists, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, myocardial infarction, cardioprotection, infarct size, myocardial contractile dysfunction, neutrophil accumulation, macrophage accumulation, leukocyte adhesion molecules, CD11b/CD18, L-selectin, ICAM-1, MCP-1, inflammation, diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Rosiglitazone, Animals, Hypoglycemic Agents, Macrophages, Male, Monocytes, Myocardial Contraction, Myocardial Infarction, Neutrophils, Rats, Inbred Lew, RNA, Messenger, Thiazoles, Transcription Factors, Myocardial Reperfusion Injury, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Macrophage-1 Antigen, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, CD18 Antigens, Chemokine CCL2, Neutrophil Infiltration, Thiazolidinediones, Diabetes Complications, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review