Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Abnormal Cardiac Enzyme Rise in Patients Treated With Bypass Surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS)

Open access
Costa, Marco A., Carere, Ronald G., Lichtenstein, Samuel V., Foley, David P., de Valk, Vincent, Lindenboom, Wietze, Roose, Paul C.H., van Geldorp, Theo R., Macaya, Carlos, Castanon, José L., Fernandez-Avilèz, Francisco, Gonzáles, Jesús Herreros, Heyer, Günter, Unger, Felix, Serruys, Patrick W.·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background Although it has been suggested that elevation of CK-MB after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, limited data are available in the setting of coronary bypass grafting. The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and prognostic significance of CK-MB elevation following multivessel coronary bypass grafting (CABG). Methods and Results The population comprises 496 patients with multivessel coronary disease assigned to CABG in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS). CK-MB was prospectively measured at 6, 12, and 18 hours after the procedure. Thirty-day and 1-year clinical follow-up were performed. Abnormal CK-MB elevation occurred in 61.9% of the patients. Patients with increased cardiac-enzyme levels after CABG were at increased risk of both death and repeat myocardial infarction within the first 30 days ( P =0.001). CK-MB elevation was also independently related to late adverse outcome ( P =0.009, OR=0.64). Conclusions Increased concentrations of CK-MB, which are often dismissed as inconsequential in the setting of multivessel CABG, appear to occur very frequently and are associated with a significant increase in both repeat myocardial infarction and death beyond the immediate perioperative period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc4701.099789

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Costa, M. A., Carere, R. G., Lichtenstein, S. V., Foley, D. P., de Valk, V., Lindenboom, W., Roose, P. C. H., van Geldorp, T. R., Macaya, C., Castanon, J. L., Fernandez-Avilèz, F., Gonzáles, J. H., Heyer, G., Unger, F., & Serruys, P. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-11-27
Volume
104
Issue
22
Pages
2689-2693
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2006921796
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Abnormal Cardiac Enzyme Rise in Patients Treated With Bypass Surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc4701.099789
The paper
Costa, M. A., Carere, R. G., Lichtenstein, S. V., Foley, D. P., de Valk, V., Lindenboom, W., Roose, P. C. H., van Geldorp, T. R., Macaya, C., Castanon, J. L., Fernandez-Avilèz, F., Gonzáles, J. H., Heyer, G., Unger, F., & Serruys, P. W. (2001). Incidence, Predictors, and Significance of Abnormal Cardiac Enzyme Rise in Patients Treated With Bypass Surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4701.099789

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.