Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 621

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Resynchronization Therapy Stimulation Site on the Systolic Function of Heart Failure Patients

Open access
Butter, Christian, Auricchio, Angelo, Stellbrink, Christoph, Fleck, Eckart, Ding, Jiang, Yu, Yinghong, Huvelle, Etienne, Spinelli, Julio·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background — Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves systolic function in heart failure patients with ventricular conduction delay by stimulating the left ventricle (LV) or both ventricles (biventricular, BV). Optimal LV site selection is of major clinical interest for CRT device implantation; however, the dependence of hemodynamics on LV stimulation site has not been established. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic response to CRT for 2 LV coronary vein sites: the free wall and anterior wall. Methods and Results — A total of 30 patients (mean NYHA class, 2.7; mean QRS interval, 152 ms; mean PR interval, 194 ms) enrolled in the PATH-CHF-II trial were studied. CRT was administered with LV and BV stimulation in VDD mode at 4 AV delays. LV stimulation was at the lateral free wall or anterior wall, whereas right ventricular stimulation was fixed near the apex. LV+dP/dt max and aortic pulse pressure changes from baseline during CRT were compared for LV sites. Free wall sites with LV and BV stimulation yielded significantly larger LV+dP/dt max (14% versus 6%, P <0.001 for LV; 12% versus 5%, P <0.001 for BV) and pulse pressure (8% versus 4%, P <0.001 for LV; 9% versus 5%, P <0.001 for BV) compared with anterior sites. In one third of patients, CRT at free wall sites increased LV+dP/dt max , whereas it decreased at anterior sites over most AV delays. Conclusion — CRT with LV free wall stimulation produced significantly better LV systolic performance compared with anterior stimulation. Further studies are warranted to prove the clinical superiority of the LV free wall as a site for long-term CRT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hc5001.102229

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 621

Metadata

Authors
Butter, C., Auricchio, A., Stellbrink, C., Fleck, E., Ding, J., Yu, Y., Huvelle, E., & Spinelli, J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-12-17
Volume
104
Issue
25
Pages
3026-3029
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2159318323
Cited by
621
References
0
FWCI
19.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Resynchronization Therapy Stimulation Site on the Systolic Function of Heart Failure Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hc5001.102229
The paper
Butter, C., Auricchio, A., Stellbrink, C., Fleck, E., Ding, J., Yu, Y., Huvelle, E., & Spinelli, J. (2001). Effect of Resynchronization Therapy Stimulation Site on the Systolic Function of Heart Failure Patients. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc5001.102229

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.