Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition Reduces Reperfusion Injury After Heart Transplantation

Open access
Szabó, Gábor, Bährle, Susanne, Stumpf, Nicole, Sonnenberg, Karin, Szabó, Éva, Pacher, Pál, Csont, Tamás, Schulz, Richard, Dengler, Thomas J., Liaudet, Lucas, Jagtap, Prakash G., Southan, Garry J., Vahl, Christian F., Hagl, Siegfried, Szabó, Csaba·2002·Circulation Research

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor PJ34 ( N -(6-oxo-5,6-dihydro-phenanthridin-2-yl)- N , N -dimethylacetamide) on myocardial and endothelial function after hypothermic ischemia and reperfusion in a heterotopic rat heart transplantation model. After a 1-hour ischemic preservation, reperfusion was started either after application of placebo or PJ34 (3 mg/kg). The assessment of left ventricular pressure–volume relations, total coronary blood flow, endothelial function, myocardial high energy phosphates, and histological analysis were performed at 1 and 24 hours of reperfusion. After 1 hour, myocardial contractility and relaxation, coronary blood flow, and endothelial function were significantly improved and myocardial high energy phosphate content was preserved in the PJ34-treated animals. Improved transplant function was also seen with treatment with another, structurally different PARP inhibitor, 5-aminoisoquinoline. The PARP inhibitors did not affect baseline cardiac function. Immunohistological staining confirmed that PJ34 prevented the activation of PARP in the transplanted hearts. The activation of P-selectin and ICAM-1 was significantly elevated in the vehicle-treated heart transplantation group. Thus, pharmacological PARP inhibition reduces reperfusion injury after heart transplantation due to prevention of energy depletion and downregulation of adhesion molecules and exerts a beneficial effect against reperfusion-induced graft coronary endothelial dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hh0102.102657

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Szabó, G., Bährle, S., Stumpf, N., Sonnenberg, K., Szabó, E., Pacher, P., Csont, T., Schulz, R., Dengler, T. J., Liaudet, L., Jagtap, P. G., Southan, G. J., Vahl, C. F., Hagl, S., & Szabó, C.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2002-01-11
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
100-106
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2165010546
Cited by
161
References
1
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition Reduces Reperfusion Injury After Heart Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hh0102.102657
The paper
Szabó, G., Bährle, S., Stumpf, N., Sonnenberg, K., Szabó, E., Pacher, P., Csont, T., Schulz, R., Dengler, T. J., Liaudet, L., Jagtap, P. G., Southan, G. J., Vahl, C. F., Hagl, S., & Szabó, C. (2002). Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition Reduces Reperfusion Injury After Heart Transplantation. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/hh0102.102657

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.