The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Ambulatory Patients
Open accessAbstract
Hypertension remains poorly controlled in the United States. Improvement of its management will require an understanding of the patient characteristics and treatment factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension. We studied antihypertensive medication use, comorbidity, and blood pressure measurements for 525 hypertensive patients in 3 different healthcare systems over a 1-year period. We concomitantly conducted comprehensive patient interviews covering demographic factors, knowledge of hypertension and its treatment, and medication side effects. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with poor blood pressure control. Mean age of the patients was 65±11 years. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 143±15 mm Hg; and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 80±9 mm Hg. Only 39% (203/525) of patients had mean blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg during the study period; about half (257/525) had stage 1 hypertension (mean SBP 140 to 159 mm Hg and/or mean DBP 90 to 99 mm Hg), and 12% (65/525) had stage 2 or greater hypertension (SBP >160 mm Hgand/or DBP >100 mm Hg). Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of poor control: older age, multi-drug regimens, lack of knowledge by the patient of their target SBP, and a report of antihypertensive drug side effects. Patients with angina had a higher likelihood of adequate blood pressure control. Fewer than 40% of the treated patients studied had a mean blood pressure ≤140/90 mm Hg, and specific patient-related factors appear to predict poor control. Some of these may be amenable to modification. Further identification of patients at risk of poor control can lead to targeted interventions to improve management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005 · Cited by 3,777
Staessen, J. A., Fagard, R., Thijs, L., Celis, H., Arabidze, G. G., Birkenhäger, W. H., Bulpitt, C. J., de Leeuw, P. W., Dollery, C. T., Fletcher, A. E., et al. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6 · Cited by 2,989
Cited by
Bramley, T. J., Nightengale, B. S., Frech-Tamas, F., & Gerbino, P. P. (2006) · Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.3.239 · Cited by 380
Medication Adherence and Persistence as the Cornerstone of Effective Antihypertensive Therapy
BURNIER, M. (2006) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.04.006 · Cited by 358
Tsioufis, C., Kasiakogias, A., Kordalis, A., Dimitriadis, K., Thomopoulos, C., Tsiachris, D., Vasileiou, P., Doumas, M., Makris, T., Papademetriou, V., et al. (2014) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000000023 · Cited by 91
Self-Measurement and Self-Titration in HypertensionA Pilot Telemedicine Study
BOBRIE, G., POSTELVINAY, N., DELONCA, J., & CORVOL, P. (2007) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.08.011 · Cited by 68
Chen, T.-Y., Kao, C.-W., Cheng, S.-M., & Chang, Y.-C. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001064 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, E. L., Bohn, R. L., Wang, P. S., Glynn, R. J., Mogun, H., & Avorn, J.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 809-814
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2113904888
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Ambulatory Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hy0901.091681
- The paper
- Knight, E. L., Bohn, R. L., Wang, P. S., Glynn, R. J., Mogun, H., & Avorn, J. (2001). Predictors of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Ambulatory Patients. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hy0901.091681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.