Cited by 68Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Self-Measurement and Self-Titration in HypertensionA Pilot Telemedicine Study

BOBRIE, G, POSTELVINAY, N, DELONCA, J, CORVOL, P·2007·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of poor patient compliance and clinical inertia, hypertension control rates remain poor. Home blood-pressure measurements (HBPM) improve compliance of patients and achievement of blood pressure (BP) targets. However, few studies have evaluated self-BP management by patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-group, open-label pilot study of 111 patients whose hypertension was uncontrolled despite monotherapy, we studied satisfaction with, and feasibility of, HBPM and self-titration of antihypertensive treatment using telemedicine for compliance, efficacy, and safety. After education (protocol, action plan, and use of the HBPM device), patients performed a sequence of HBPM every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following a stepwise approach, treatment was increased by the patient at weeks 4 and 6 if average HBPM values exceeded predefined limits. For each titration, the patient informed the Core Center by telemedicine, but BP values were transferred automatically. RESULTS: Overall, 80% of patients were satisfied (58%) or very satisfied (23%) with the program (95% confidence interval, 73% to 87%). Regarding compliance, 78% of patients fully complied with self-measurement, and just over 71% titrated their treatment adequately. Physicians were satisfied (52%) or very satisfied (22%) with the program. Between the first and final visits (at week 8), office systolic/diastolic BP (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 151 +/- 9/91 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 13/84 +/- 11 mmHg. During the trial, HBPM (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 149 +/- 13/86 +/- 12 to 138 +/- 16/81 +/- 10 mmHg. No significant safety issues were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative approach to the management of hypertension, combining self-measurement and self-titration, is feasible, well-accepted by both patients and physicians, and safe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.08.011

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BOBRIE, G., POSTELVINAY, N., DELONCA, J., & CORVOL, P.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
BOBRIE, G
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2007-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1314-1320
ISSN
0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024198186
Cited by
68
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
hypertension, home blood pressure monitoring, self-titration, telemedicine, antihypertensive therapy, medication adherence, uncontrolled hypertension, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, blood pressure control
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Self Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review