The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Effects of Ramipril on Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressures: A HOPE Substudy
Open accessAbstract
In the HOPE-trial, the ACE inhibitor ramipril significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. The benefit could only partly be attributed to the modest mean reduction of office blood pressure (OBP) during the study period (3/2 mm Hg). However, because according to the HOPE protocol ramipril was given once daily at bedtime and blood pressure was measured during the day, the 24-hour reduction of blood pressure may be underestimated based on OBP. Thirty-eight patients with peripheral arterial disease enrolled in the HOPE study underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement before randomization and after 1 year. OBP was measured in the sitting position immediately before fitting the ABP measuring equipment to the patients. Ramipril did not significantly reduce OBP (8/2 mm Hg, P =NS) or day ABP (6/2 mm Hg, P =NS) after 1 year. Twenty-four–hour ABP was significantly reduced (10/4 mm Hg, P =0.03), mainly because of a more pronounced blood pressure lowering effect during nighttime (17/8 mm Hg, P <0.001). The night/day ratio was also significantly lowered in the ramipril group. ABP shows greater falls, especially at night, than OBP during treatment with ramipril given once daily at bedtime. Although, OBP is the correct comparator when comparing with previous large intervention trials and epidemiological studies, the effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen with ramipril in the HOPE study may, to a larger extent than previously ascribed, relate to effects on blood pressure patterns over the 24-hour period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200001203420301 · Cited by 8,663
Cited by
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
Hermida, R. C., Ayala, D. E., Mojón, A., & Fernández, J. R. (2010) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.3109/07420528.2010.510230 · Cited by 608
Circadian rhythms and the molecular clock in cardiovascular biology and disease
Crnko, S., Du Pré, B. C., Sluijter, J. P. G., & Van Laake, L. W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-019-0167-4 · Cited by 499
Sjølie, A. K., Klein, R., Porta, M., Orchard, T., Fuller, J., Parving, H. H., Bilous, R., & Chaturvedi, N. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61411-7 · Cited by 435
Ernst, M. E., Carter, B. L., Goerdt, C. J., Steffensmeier, J. J. G., Phillips, B. B., Zimmerman, M. B., & Bergus, G. R. (2006) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000203309.07140.d3 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, P., de Faire, U., Sleight, P., Yusuf, S., & Östergren, J.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E28-32
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2117939109
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Effects of Ramipril on Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressures: A HOPE Substudy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hy1101.099502
- The paper
- Svensson, P., de Faire, U., Sleight, P., Yusuf, S., & Östergren, J. (2001). Comparative Effects of Ramipril on Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressures: A HOPE Substudy. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hy1101.099502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.