The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Hypertension Management and Control: Results From the Health Survey for England 1998
Open accessAbstract
A survey in 1994 showed that among the 20% of the adult English population who were identified as hypertensive, ≈30% had their blood pressures controlled to <160 mm Hg systolic and <95 mm Hg diastolic. The 1998 Health Survey for England data update the 1994 findings in light of new thresholds and targets for treatment outlined in recent national and international guidelines. This cross-sectional survey is analyzed to describe the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in a random, nationally representative sample of 11 529 English adults (≥16 years) living in noninstitutional households in 1998 and to compare these rates with those from 1994. In 1998, 20% and 37% of adults were hypertensive according to the old (systolic ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic ≥95 mm Hg) and new (systolic ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic ≥90 mm Hg) definitions, respectively. Corresponding values in 1994 were 20% and 38%. Treatment and control rates among hypertensive adults (new definition) improved from 26% to 32% and from 6% to 9%, respectively, although 60% of those on treatment received only 1 antihypertensive drug in both years. Among persons with controlled hypertension, 59% reported having received nonpharmacological advice from their physicians in 1998 compared with 30% in 1994. Rates of hypertension treatment and control have increased significantly ( P =0.05 and P <0.01, respectively) since 1994 but remain low by international standards. The 1998 data suggest that improved detection, greater use of nonpharmacological measures, and increased use of >1 antihypertensive agent per patient would produce greater success in achieving target levels. This could lead to major reductions in fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hansson, L., Zanchetti, A., Carruthers, S. G., Dahlöf, B., Elmfeldt, D., Julius, S., Ménard, J., Rahn, K. H., Wedel, H., & Westerling, S. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04311-6 · Cited by 5,728
(1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005 · Cited by 3,777
Cited by
Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension: the WHO MONICA Project
Antikainen, R. L., Moltchanov, V. A., Chukwuma, C., Kuulasmaa, K. A., Marques-Vidal, P. M., Sans, S., Wilhelmsen, L., & Tuomilehto, J. O. (2006) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00149831-200602000-00004 · Cited by 132
Unal, B., Critchley, J., & Capewell, S. (2003) · Tobacco Induced Diseases · doi:10.1186/1617-9625-1-3-185 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Primatesta, P., Brookes, M., & Poulter, N. R.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 827-832
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W1944860329
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Hypertension Management and Control: Results From the Health Survey for England 1998. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hyp.38.4.827
- The paper
- Primatesta, P., Brookes, M., & Poulter, N. R. (2001). Improved Hypertension Management and Control: Results From the Health Survey for England 1998. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.38.4.827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.