Cited by 8Smoking Behavior and CessationHealthcare Systems and Public HealthGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Impact of Smoking Reduction on Coronary Heart Disease Mortality Trends During 1981–2000 in England and Wales

Open access
Unal, B, Critchley, JA, Capewell, S·2003·Tobacco Induced Diseases

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore how much of the coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality fall in England and Wales can be attributed to changes in smoking prevalence. METHODS: A previously validated cell-based IMPACT CHD mortality model was used to estimate the deaths prevented or postponed by changes in population smoking prevalence in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000. CHD mortality statistics and population trends in smoking were obtained from routine data sources. RESULTS: In England and Wales between 1981 and 2000, smoking prevalence in adults aged 25-84 decreased from 43% to 28% in men and from 35% to 24% in women. In men, most of the decrease occurred in those aged over 55. Smoking prevalence changed little in older women. An estimated 29,460 deaths were prevented or postponed (DPP) by this population reduction in smoking prevalence. Most of this benefit was seen in men (86% of the DPPs versus 14% in women). CONCLUSION: Large declines in smoking prevalence accounted for 29,460 fewer CHD deaths in England and Wales in 2000 compared with 1981. This emphasises the importance of a national strategy with comprehensive tobacco control programmes to further reduce smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1617-9625-1-3-185

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ONS-Office for National Statistics Population:Age and sex, 1971 onwards Health Statistics Quarterly 2001 11
  2. ONS-Office for National Statistics Mortality Statistics cause. Review of the Registrar General on deaths by cause, sex and age, in England and Wales, 1999 2000 London, Stationery Office

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unal, B., Critchley, J., & Capewell, S.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Published
2003
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
185
ISSN
1617-9625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126648098
Cited by
8
References
73
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Tobacco Induced Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
smoking prevalence, coronary heart disease mortality, mortality trends, IMPACT model, tobacco control, sex differences in smoking, older adults, England and Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review