The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First-Trimester Prediction of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy
Abstract
This study aimed to establish a method of screening for pregnancy hypertension by a combination of maternal variables, including mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, and placental growth factor in early pregnancy. The base-cohort population constituted of 7797 singleton pregnancies, including 34 case subjects who developed preeclampsia (PE) requiring delivery before 34 weeks (early PE) and 123 with late PE, 136 with gestational hypertension, and 7504 cases subjects (96.3%) who were unaffected by PE or gestational hypertension. Maternal history, uterine artery pulsatility index, mean arterial pressure, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A were recorded in all of the cases in the base cohort, but placental growth factor was measured only in the case-control population of 209 cases who developed hypertensive disorders and 418 controls. In each case the measured mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, and placental growth factor were converted to a multiple of the expected median (MoM) after correction for maternal characteristics found to affect the measurements in the unaffected group. Early PE and late PE were associated with increased mean arterial pressure (1.15 MoM and 1.08 MoM) and uterine artery pulsatility index (1.53 MoM and 1.23 MoM) and decreased pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (0.53 MoM and 0.93 MoM) and placental growth factor (0.61 MoM and 0.83 MoM). Logistic regression analysis was used to derive algorithms for the prediction of hypertensive disorders. It was estimated that, with the algorithm for early PE, 93.1%, 35.7%, and 18.3% of early PE, late PE, and gestational hypertension, respectively, could be detected with a 5% false-positive rate and that 1 in 5 pregnancies classified as being screen positive would develop pregnancy hypertension. This method of screening is far superior to the traditional approach, which relies entirely on maternal history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maynard, S. E., Min, J.-Y., Merchan, J., Lim, K.-H., Li, J., Mondal, S., Libermann, T. A., Morgan, J. P., Sellke, F. W., Stillman, I. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci17189 · Cited by 4,101
Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia
Levine, R. J., Maynard, S. E., Qian, C., Lim, K.-H., England, L. J., Yu, K. F., Schisterman, E. F., Thadhani, R., Sachs, B. P., Epstein, F. H., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031884 · Cited by 3,720
Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia*
(2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-200405000-00028 · Cited by 2,615
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
KHONG, T. Y., DE WOLF, F., ROBERTSON, W. B., & BROSENS, I. (1986) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07830.x · Cited by 1,591
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Davey, D. A., & MacGillivray, I. (1988) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90090-7 · Cited by 1,288
Practice bulletin #33: diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice (2002) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01747-1 · Cited by 1,058
Irgens, H. U., Roberts, J. M., Reisæter, L., Irgens, L. M., & Lie, R. T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1213 · Cited by 1,040
Subclassification of Preeclampsia
von Dadelszen, P., Magee, L. A., & Roberts, J. M. (2003) · Hypertension in Pregnancy · doi:10.1081/prg-120021060 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 · Cited by 2,949
Steegers, E. A., von Dadelszen, P., Duvekot, J. J., & Pijnenborg, R. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60279-6 · Cited by 2,850
Rana (2019) · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313276 · Cited by 2,095
Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers
Akolekar, R., Syngelaki, A., Poon, L., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2013) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000341264 · Cited by 601
Self-citationIntrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management
Figueras, F., & Gardosi, J. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Poon, L. C. Y., Kametas, N. A., Maiz, N., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 812-818
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2122059901
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 33.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-Trimester Prediction of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.127977
- The paper
- Poon, L. C. Y., Kametas, N. A., Maiz, N., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009). First-Trimester Prediction of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.127977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.