Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of Brachial and Digital Measures of Vascular Function in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Hamburg, Naomi M., Palmisano, Joseph, Larson, Martin G., Sullivan, Lisa M., Lehman, Birgitta T., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Levy, Daniel, Mitchell, Gary F., Vita, Joseph A., Benjamin, Emelia J.·2011·Hypertension

Abstract

Impaired vascular function contributes to the development of clinical cardiovascular disease. The relation between vasodilator function assessed noninvasively in the brachial and digital arteries remains incompletely defined. In the Framingham Offspring, Third Generation and Omni Cohorts, we measured flow-mediated dilation (FMD; n=7031; age 48±13 years; age range, 19 to 88 years; 54% women) and peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) ratio (n=4352; 55±16 years; age range, 19 to 90 years; 51% women). Abnormal vascular function for each measure was defined by the sex-specific fifth percentile in a reference group free of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. The prevalence of abnormal FMD but not abnormal PAT ratio was higher with advancing age. In multivariable models, higher body mass index was associated with a higher prevalence of both abnormal FMD and PAT ratio. Additional correlates of abnormal FMD included increasing age and higher systolic blood pressure. In contrast, correlates of abnormal PAT ratio included lower systolic blood pressure, increasing total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, diabetes, smoking, and lipid-lowering medication. Whereas women had higher FMD and PAT ratios compared with men, using sex-specific reference values, women had a higher prevalence of abnormal brachial and digital vascular function. In participants who had concurrent testing (n=1843), PAT ratio was not significantly associated with FMD in multivariable models. In this large, community-based cohort, brachial and digital measures of vascular function had differing relations with cardiovascular risk factors and were nearly uncorrelated with each other. These results suggest that FMD and PAT provide distinct information regarding vascular function in conduit versus smaller digital vessels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.160812

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Hamburg, N. M., Palmisano, J., Larson, M. G., Sullivan, L. M., Lehman, B. T., Vasan, R. S., Levy, D., Mitchell, G. F., Vita, J. A., & Benjamin, E. J.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2011-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
390-396
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W1985757967
Cited by
364
References
28
FWCI
20.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation of Brachial and Digital Measures of Vascular Function in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.160812
The paper
Hamburg, N. M., Palmisano, J., Larson, M. G., Sullivan, L. M., Lehman, B. T., Vasan, R. S., Levy, D., Mitchell, G. F., Vita, J. A., & Benjamin, E. J. (2011). Relation of Brachial and Digital Measures of Vascular Function in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.160812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.