Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adrenal Venous Sampling: Evaluation of the German Conn's Registry

Vonend, Oliver, Ockenfels, Nora, Gao, Xing, Allolio, Bruno, Lang, Katharina, Mai, Knut, Quack, Ivo, Saleh, Andreas, Degenhart, Christoph, Seufert, Jochen, Seiler, Lysann, Beuschlein, Felix, Quinkler, Marcus, Podrabsky, Petr, Bidlingmaier, Martin, Lorenz, Reinhard, Reincke, Martin, Rump, Lars Christian, for the participants of the German Conn's Registry·2011·Hypertension

Abstract

In patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenal venous sampling is helpful to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral adrenal diseases. However, the procedure is technically challenging, and selective bilateral catheterization often fails. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate success rate in a retrospective analysis and compare data with procedures done prospectively after introduction of measures designed to improve rates of successful cannulation. Patients were derived from a cross-sectional study involving 5 German centers (German Conn's registry). In the retrospective phase, 569 patients with primary aldosteronism were registered between 1990 and 2007, of whom 230 received adrenal venous sampling. In 200 patients there were sufficient data to evaluate the procedure. In 2008 and 2009, primary aldosteronism was diagnosed in 156 patients, and adrenal venous sampling was done in 106 and evaluated prospectively. Retrospective evaluation revealed that 31% were bilaterally selective when a selectivity index (cortisol adrenal vein/cortisol inferior vena cava) of ≥2.0 was applied. Centers completing <20 procedures had success rates between 8% and 10%. Overall success rate increased in the prospective phase from 31% to 61%. Retrospective data demonstrated the pitfalls of performing adrenal venous sampling. Even in specialized centers, success rates were poor. Marked improvements could be observed in the prospective phase. Selected centers that implemented specific measures to increase accuracy, such as rapid-cortisol-assay and introduction of standard operating procedures, reached success rates of >70%. These data demonstrate the importance of throughput, expertise, and various potentially beneficial measures to improve adrenal vein sampling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.168484

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Vonend, O., Ockenfels, N., Gao, X., Allolio, B., Lang, K., Mai, K., Quack, I., Saleh, A., Degenhart, C., Seufert, J., Seiler, L., Beuschlein, F., Quinkler, M., Podrabsky, P., Bidlingmaier, M., Lorenz, R., Reincke, M., Rump, L. C., & for the participants of the German Conn's Registry
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2011-05
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
990-995
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2121705605
Cited by
246
References
1
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adrenal Venous Sampling: Evaluation of the German Conn's Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.168484
The paper
Vonend, O., Ockenfels, N., Gao, X., Allolio, B., Lang, K., Mai, K., Quack, I., Saleh, A., Degenhart, C., Seufert, J., Seiler, L., Beuschlein, F., Quinkler, M., Podrabsky, P., Bidlingmaier, M., Lorenz, R., Reincke, M., Rump, L. C., & for the participants of the German Conn's Registry. (2011). Adrenal Venous Sampling: Evaluation of the German Conn's Registry. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.168484

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.