The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Community screening to guide preventive interventions for acute aortic disease has been recommended in high‐risk individuals. We sought to prospectively assess risk factors in the general population for aortic dissection ( AD ) and severe aneurysmal disease in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Methods and Results: We studied the incidence of AD and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms in the abdominal ( AAA ) or thoracic aorta ( TAA ) in 30 412 individuals without diagnosis of aortic disease at baseline from a contemporary, prospective cohort of middle‐aged individuals, the Malmö Diet and Cancer study. During up to 20 years of follow‐up (median 16 years), the incidence rate per 100 000 patient‐years at risk was 15 (95% CI 11.7 to 18.9) for AD , 27 (95% CI 22.5 to 32.1) for AAA , and 9 (95% CI 6.8 to 12.6) for TAA . The acute and in‐hospital mortality was 39% for AD , 34% for ruptured AAA , and 41% for ruptured TAA . Hypertension was present in 86% of individuals who subsequently developed AD , was strongly associated with incident AD (hazard ratio [ HR ] 2.64, 95% CI 1.33 to 5.25), and conferred a population‐attributable risk of 54%. Hypertension was also a risk factor for AAA with a smaller effect. Smoking ( HR 5.07, 95% CI 3.52 to 7.29) and high apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio ( HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.73 to 3.54) were strongly associated with AAA and conferred a population‐attributable risk of 47% and 25%, respectively. Smoking was also a risk factor for AD and TAA with smaller effects. Conclusions: This large prospective study identified distinct risk factor profiles for different aortic diseases in the general population. Hypertension accounted for more than half of the population risk for AD , and smoking for half of the population risk of AAA .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register
Ludvigsson, J. F., Andersson, E., Ekbom, A., Feychting, M., Kim, J.-L., Reuterwall, C., Heurgren, M., & Olausson, P. O. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-450 · Cited by 5,055
Bias in case-control studies. A review.
Kopec, J. A., & Esdaile, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.44.3.179 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Editor's Choice – Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases
Riambau, V., Böckler, D., Brunkwall, J., Cao, P., Chiesa, R., Coppi, G., Czerny, M., Fraedrich, G., Haulon, S., Jacobs, M. J., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005 · Cited by 1,246
EACTS/STS Guidelines for diagnosing and treating acute and chronic syndromes of the aortic organ
Czerny, M., Grabenwöger, M., Berger, T., Aboyans, V., Della Corte, A., Chen, E. P., Desai, N. D., Dumfarth, J., Elefteriades, J. A., Etz, C. D., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezad426 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Landenhed, M., Engström, G., Gottsäter, A., Caulfield, M. P., Hedblad, B., Newton‐Cheh, C., Melander, O., & Smith, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Published
- 2015-01-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e001513-e001513
- ISSN
- 2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148069661
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/jaha.114.001513
- The paper
- Landenhed, M., Engström, G., Gottsäter, A., Caulfield, M. P., Hedblad, B., Newton‐Cheh, C., Melander, O., & Smith, J. G. (2015). Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.114.001513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.