Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study

Open access
Landenhed, Maya, Engström, Gunnar, Gottsäter, Anders, Caulfield, Michael P., Hedblad, Bo, Newton‐Cheh, Christopher, Melander, Olle, Smith, J. Gustav·2015·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: Community screening to guide preventive interventions for acute aortic disease has been recommended in high‐risk individuals. We sought to prospectively assess risk factors in the general population for aortic dissection ( AD ) and severe aneurysmal disease in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Methods and Results: We studied the incidence of AD and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms in the abdominal ( AAA ) or thoracic aorta ( TAA ) in 30 412 individuals without diagnosis of aortic disease at baseline from a contemporary, prospective cohort of middle‐aged individuals, the Malmö Diet and Cancer study. During up to 20 years of follow‐up (median 16 years), the incidence rate per 100 000 patient‐years at risk was 15 (95% CI 11.7 to 18.9) for AD , 27 (95% CI 22.5 to 32.1) for AAA , and 9 (95% CI 6.8 to 12.6) for TAA . The acute and in‐hospital mortality was 39% for AD , 34% for ruptured AAA , and 41% for ruptured TAA . Hypertension was present in 86% of individuals who subsequently developed AD , was strongly associated with incident AD (hazard ratio [ HR ] 2.64, 95% CI 1.33 to 5.25), and conferred a population‐attributable risk of 54%. Hypertension was also a risk factor for AAA with a smaller effect. Smoking ( HR 5.07, 95% CI 3.52 to 7.29) and high apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio ( HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.73 to 3.54) were strongly associated with AAA and conferred a population‐attributable risk of 47% and 25%, respectively. Smoking was also a risk factor for AD and TAA with smaller effects. Conclusions: This large prospective study identified distinct risk factor profiles for different aortic diseases in the general population. Hypertension accounted for more than half of the population risk for AD , and smoking for half of the population risk of AAA .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.114.001513

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Landenhed, M., Engström, G., Gottsäter, A., Caulfield, M. P., Hedblad, B., Newton‐Cheh, C., Melander, O., & Smith, J. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2015-01-05
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e001513-e001513
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148069661
Cited by
367
References
2
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/jaha.114.001513
The paper
Landenhed, M., Engström, G., Gottsäter, A., Caulfield, M. P., Hedblad, B., Newton‐Cheh, C., Melander, O., & Smith, J. G. (2015). Risk Profiles for Aortic Dissection and Ruptured or Surgically Treated Aneurysms: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.114.001513

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.