Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Frailty on Mortality and Hospitalization in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Yang, Xiaobo, Lupón, Josep, Vidán, Maria T., Ferguson, Caleb, Gastelurrutia, Paloma, Newton, Phillip J., Macdonald, Peter S., Bueno, Héctor, Bayés‐Genís, Antoni, Woo, Jean, Fung, Erik·2018·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: Although frailty has been associated with increased risks for hospitalization and mortality in chronic heart failure, the precise average effect remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to summarize the hazards for mortality and incident hospitalization in patients with heart failure and frailty compared with those without frailty and explored the heterogeneity underlying the effect size estimates. Methods and Results: MEDLINE , EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for articles published between January 1966 and March 2018. Predefined selection criteria were used. Hazard ratios ( HRs ) were pooled for meta‐analyses, and where odds ratios were used previously, original data were recalculated for HR . Overlapping data were consolidated, and only unique data points were used. Study quality and bias were assessed. Eight studies were included for mortality (2645 patients), and 6 studies were included for incident hospitalization (2541 patients) during a median follow‐up of 1.82 and 1.12 years, respectively. Frailty was significantly associated with an increased hazard for mortality ( HR , 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.34–1.75; P <0.001) and incident hospitalization ( HR , 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–1.78; P <0.001) in chronic heart failure. The Fried phenotype estimated a 16.9% larger effect size than the combined Fried/non‐Fried frailty assessment for the end point of mortality ( HR , 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.41–2.28; P <0.001), but not for hospitalization ( HR , 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.30–1.89; P <0.001). Study heterogeneity was found to be low (I 2 =0%), and high quality of studies was verified by the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Conclusions: Overall, the presence of frailty in chronic heart failure is associated with an increased hazard for death and hospitalization by ≈1.5‐fold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.117.008251

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Yang, X., Lupón, J., Vidán, M. T., Ferguson, C., Gastelurrutia, P., Newton, P. J., Macdonald, P. S., Bueno, H., Bayés‐Genís, A., Woo, J., & Fung, E.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
7
Issue
23
Pages
e008251-e008251
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901157399
Cited by
292
References
63
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Frailty on Mortality and Hospitalization in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/jaha.117.008251
The paper
Yang, X., Lupón, J., Vidán, M. T., Ferguson, C., Gastelurrutia, P., Newton, P. J., Macdonald, P. S., Bueno, H., Bayés‐Genís, A., Woo, J., & Fung, E. (2018). Impact of Frailty on Mortality and Hospitalization in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.008251

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.