Cited by 177Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Congenital heart disease and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Open access
Wang, Tingting, Chen, Lizhang, Yang, Tubao, Huang, Peng, Wang, Lesan, Zhao, Lijuan, Zhang, Senmao, Ye, Ziwei +3 more·2019·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background Despite remarkable success in the surgical and medical management of congenital heart disease ( CHD ), some survivors still experience cardiovascular complications over the long term. The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between CHD and risk of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Methods and Results A systematic literature search of several databases was conducted through April 2018 to identify studies reporting the risk of CVD , stroke, heart failure, and coronary artery heart disease in CHD survivors. The quality of individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The overall risk estimates were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore possible sources of heterogeneity. Nine cohort studies comprising 684 200 participants were included. The overall combined relative risks for people with CHD compared with the controls were 3.12 (95% CI, 3.01-3.24) for CVD , 2.46 (95% CI, 2.30-2.63) for stroke, 5.89 (95% CI, 5.58-6.21) for heart failure, and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.40-1.61) for coronary artery heart disease. Significant heterogeneity was detected across studies regarding these risk estimates. Heterogeneity in the risk estimate of CVD was explained by geographic region, type of study design, sample source, age composition, and controlled confounders. Conclusions This meta-analysis of cohort studies of CHD found an association of increased risk of CVD in later life, although we cannot determine whether this association is confounded by a risk factor profile of CVD among CHD survivors or whether CHD is an independent risk factor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.119.012030

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis. America: Wiley; 2012. ISBN: 978‐0‐470‐05724‐7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Chen, L., Yang, T., Huang, P., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Zhang, S., Ye, Z., Chen, L., Zheng, Z., & Qin, J.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Hunan Children's Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics Xiangya School of Public Health Central South University Changsha China
Corresponding author
Qin, Jiabi
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e012030-e012030
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943890763
Cited by
177
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
congenital heart disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, heart failure, coronary artery disease, long-term outcomes, cardiovascular risk factors, confounding
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Survivors, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review