The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is There a Sex Difference in the Prognosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
Background: It is still unclear whether there is a sex difference in the prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis to elucidate the association between sex and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. Methods and Results: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were used to search for studies on sex differences in prognosis in patients with HCM up to August 17, 2021. Summary effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) (registration number‐ CRD42021262053). A total of 27 cohorts involving 42 365 patients with HCM were included. Compared with male subjects, female subjects had a higher age at onset (mean difference=5.61 [95% CI, 4.03–7.19]), a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (standard mean difference=0.09 [95% CI, 0.02–0.15]) and a higher left ventricular outflow tract gradient (standard mean difference=0.23 [95% CI, 0.18–0.29]). The results showed that compared with male subjects with HCM, female subjects had higher risks of HCM‐related events (risk ratio [RR]=1.61 [95% CI, 1.33–1.94], I 2 =49%), major cardiovascular events (RR=3.59 [95% CI, 2.26–5.71], I 2 =0%), HCM‐related death (RR=1.57 [95% CI, 1.34–1.82], I 2 =0%), cardiovascular death (RR=1.55 [95% CI, 1.05–2.28], I 2 =58%), noncardiovascular death (RR=1.77 [95% CI, 1.46–2.13], I 2 =0%) and all‐cause mortality (RR=1.43 [95% CI, 1.09–1.87], I 2 =95%), but not atrial fibrillation (RR=1.13 [95% CI, 0.95–1.35], I 2 =5%), ventricular arrhythmia (RR=0.88 [95% CI, 0.71–1.10], I 2 =0%), sudden cardiac death (RR=1.04 [95% CI, 0.75–1.42], I 2 =38%) or composite end point (RR=1.24 [95% CI, 0.96–1.60], I 2 =85%). Conclusions: Based on current evidence, our results show significant sex‐specific differences in the prognosis of HCM. Future guidelines may emphasize the use of a sex‐specific risk assessment for the diagnosis and management of HCM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have higher rates of heart failure and mortality.
“Women with the disease have higher rates of heart failure and mortality.14”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Committee Members, Ommen, S. R., Mital, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A., Elliott, P., Evanovich, L. L., Hung, J., Joglar, J. A., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000938 · Cited by 336
Differences in catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between males and females
Takigawa, M., Kuwahara, T., Takahashi, A., Watari, Y., Okubo, K., Takahashi, Y., Takagi, K., Kuroda, S., Osaka, Y., Kawaguchi, N., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.101 · Cited by 106
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 78
- 10.1213/ane.0000000000000538 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.043 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.92.7.1680 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01003-2 · DOI
- 10.1161/circulationaha.117.033200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/clc.20057 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.0000162460.36735.71 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.040 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0102969 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx527 · DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.119.012041 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-84335-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.040 · DOI
- 10.1097/md.0000000000008273 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00443-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/obr.12970 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.040 · DOI
- 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315160 · DOI
- 10.1161/circep.116.004052 · DOI
- 10.1177/2047487319886961 · DOI
- 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.13676 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.059 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00380-019-01492-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-84335-1 · DOI
- 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0845 · DOI
- 10.1161/circgen.120.003062 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4534 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0084 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rec.2020.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1161/hc4601.097997 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1723/2696.27568 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.091 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1161/circulationaha.118.037264 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.023 · DOI
- 10.1161/circulationaha.109.935551 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1161/jaha.119.014448 · DOI
- 10.1177/2047487319890996 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.979 · DOI
- 10.1253/jcj.63.859 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13293-016-0118-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00266-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.026 · DOI
- 10.1177/174182679700400106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000517618 · DOI
- 10.1097/hco.0000000000000612 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.032 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00323-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10554-020-01880-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s13293-016-0074-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.012 · DOI
- 10.1159/000176895 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0167-5273(00)00401-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80046-5 · DOI
- 10.1186/1476-7120-8-54 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1080/14017431.2018.1446549 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.HCM.0000285057.32235.5e · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.06.021 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2361 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcvm.2021.612215 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpheart.00615.2006 · DOI
- 10.1089/jwh.2007.0734 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0232427 · DOI
- 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.15857 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Sikand, N., Stendahl, J., Sen, S., Lampert, R., & Day, S. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077274 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Tan, Z., Liu, M., Yu, P., Ma, J., Li, X., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Zhu, W., & Liu, X.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Published
- 2023-06-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 2047-9980
- PMC
- PMC10381980
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review