Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is There a Sex Difference in the Prognosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Zhao, Huilei, Tan, Ziqi, Liu, Menglu, Yu, Peng, Ma, Jianyong, Li, Xiaozhong, Wang, Jingfeng, Zhao, Yujie, Zhu, Wengen, Liu, Xiao·2023·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: It is still unclear whether there is a sex difference in the prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis to elucidate the association between sex and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. Methods and Results: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were used to search for studies on sex differences in prognosis in patients with HCM up to August 17, 2021. Summary effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) (registration number‐ CRD42021262053). A total of 27 cohorts involving 42 365 patients with HCM were included. Compared with male subjects, female subjects had a higher age at onset (mean difference=5.61 [95% CI, 4.03–7.19]), a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (standard mean difference=0.09 [95% CI, 0.02–0.15]) and a higher left ventricular outflow tract gradient (standard mean difference=0.23 [95% CI, 0.18–0.29]). The results showed that compared with male subjects with HCM, female subjects had higher risks of HCM‐related events (risk ratio [RR]=1.61 [95% CI, 1.33–1.94], I 2 =49%), major cardiovascular events (RR=3.59 [95% CI, 2.26–5.71], I 2 =0%), HCM‐related death (RR=1.57 [95% CI, 1.34–1.82], I 2 =0%), cardiovascular death (RR=1.55 [95% CI, 1.05–2.28], I 2 =58%), noncardiovascular death (RR=1.77 [95% CI, 1.46–2.13], I 2 =0%) and all‐cause mortality (RR=1.43 [95% CI, 1.09–1.87], I 2 =95%), but not atrial fibrillation (RR=1.13 [95% CI, 0.95–1.35], I 2 =5%), ventricular arrhythmia (RR=0.88 [95% CI, 0.71–1.10], I 2 =0%), sudden cardiac death (RR=1.04 [95% CI, 0.75–1.42], I 2 =38%) or composite end point (RR=1.24 [95% CI, 0.96–1.60], I 2 =85%). Conclusions: Based on current evidence, our results show significant sex‐specific differences in the prognosis of HCM. Future guidelines may emphasize the use of a sex‐specific risk assessment for the diagnosis and management of HCM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.122.026270

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have higher rates of heart failure and mortality.

    “Women with the disease have higher rates of heart failure and mortality.14”

    From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.1213/ane.0000000000000538 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.043 · DOI
  3. 10.1161/01.CIR.92.7.1680 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01003-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/circulationaha.117.033200 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/clc.20057 · DOI
  7. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000162460.36735.71 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.040 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102969 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx527 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/JAHA.119.012041 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41598-021-84335-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.040 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/md.0000000000008273 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00443-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/obr.12970 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.040 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315160 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/circep.116.004052 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/2047487319886961 · DOI
  23. 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.13676 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.020 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.017 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.059 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00380-019-01492-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41598-021-84335-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0845 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/circgen.120.003062 · DOI
  31. 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4534 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.004 · DOI
  33. 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0084 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.rec.2020.01.007 · DOI
  35. 10.1161/hc4601.097997 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.07.010 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.014 · DOI
  38. 10.1723/2696.27568 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.091 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.011 · DOI
  41. 10.1161/circulationaha.118.037264 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.023 · DOI
  43. 10.1161/circulationaha.109.935551 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.12.004 · DOI
  45. 10.1161/jaha.119.014448 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/2047487319890996 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.004 · DOI
  48. 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.979 · DOI
  49. 10.1253/jcj.63.859 · DOI
  50. 10.1186/s13293-016-0118-2 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00266-2 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.026 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/174182679700400106 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.045 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1159/000517618 · DOI
  56. 10.1097/hco.0000000000000612 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.032 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00323-6 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s10554-020-01880-y · DOI
  60. 10.1186/s13293-016-0074-x · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.012 · DOI
  62. 10.1159/000176895 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.005 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.016 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/s0167-5273(00)00401-0 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80046-5 · DOI
  67. 10.1186/1476-7120-8-54 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn122 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.002 · DOI
  70. 10.1080/14017431.2018.1446549 · DOI
  71. 10.1097/01.HCM.0000285057.32235.5e · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.06.021 · DOI
  73. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2361 · DOI
  74. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.612215 · DOI
  75. 10.1152/ajpheart.00615.2006 · DOI
  76. 10.1089/jwh.2007.0734 · DOI
  77. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232427 · DOI
  78. 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.15857 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, H., Tan, Z., Liu, M., Yu, P., Ma, J., Li, X., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Zhu, W., & Liu, X.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2023-06-06
Volume
12
Issue
11
ISSN
2047-9980
Cited by
35
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review