Cited by 6Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesConnective tissue disorders research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Asymptomatic Common Carotid Artery Dissection on the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Open access
Jia, Songhao, Wang, Maozhou, Liu, Yuyong, Gong, Ming, Jiang, Wenjian, Zhang, Hongjia·2024·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection can extend upwards to involve the common carotid artery. However, whether asymptomatic common carotid artery dissection (CCAD) requires surgical repair remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the effect of asymptomatic CCAD without surgical intervention on the prognosis of patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Methods and Results: Between January 2015 and December 2017, 485 patients with no neurological symptoms who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the exposure factor of CCAD. CCAD was detected in 111 patients (22.9%), and after adjusting baseline data (standardized mean difference <0.1), the 30‐day mortality (17.1% versus 6.0%, P <0.001) and incidence of fatal stroke (7.7% versus 1.6%, P =0.001) were significantly higher in the group with CCAD. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses found CCAD as an independent risk factor for 30‐day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5–5.2]; P =0.001). At a median follow‐up of 6.2 years (interquartile range, 5.6–6.9 years), landmark analysis with a cutoff value of 1 month postoperatively showed a significant increase in mortality in the group with CCAD, especially in the first month (log‐rank P =0.002) and no significant difference in survival after the first month postoperatively between the 2 groups (log‐rank P =0.955). Conclusions: Asymptomatic CCAD increased the risk of early fatal stroke and death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection after surgery but did not affect midterm survival in patients who survived the early postoperative period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.123.031542

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Study design. CCAD indicates common carotid artery dissection; and SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Figure 1 Study design. CCAD indicates common carotid artery dissection; and SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Covariate balance. AST indicates aspartate aminotransferase; SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting; SMD, standardized mean difference; Tn I, troponin I; and WBC, white blood cell.
Figure 2 Covariate balance. AST indicates aspartate aminotransferase; SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting; SMD, standardized mean difference; Tn I, troponin I; and WBC, white blood cell.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier curve without SIPTW (A) and with SIPTW (B). x axis: follow‐up time since surgery (days); y axis: rate of survival probability. ATAAD indicates acute type A aortic dissection; CCAD, common carotid artery dissection; and SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier curve without SIPTW (A) and with SIPTW (B). x axis: follow‐up time since surgery (days); y axis: rate of survival probability. ATAAD indicates acute type A aortic dissection; CCAD, common carotid artery dissection; and SIPTW, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Thirty‐day mortality of CCAD in subgroup analysis. CABG indicates coronary angioplasty bypass grafting; CCAD, common carotid artery dissection; and HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 4 Thirty‐day mortality of CCAD in subgroup analysis. CABG indicates coronary angioplasty bypass grafting; CCAD, common carotid artery dissection; and HR, hazard ratio.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Kaplan–Meier curve and landmark analysis. x axis: follow‐up time since surgery (months); y axis: rate of survival probability. ATAAD indicates acute type A aortic dissection; and CCAD, common carotid artery dissection.
Figure 5 Kaplan–Meier curve and landmark analysis. x axis: follow‐up time since surgery (months); y axis: rate of survival probability. ATAAD indicates acute type A aortic dissection; and CCAD, common carotid artery dissection.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.029 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005840 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.134 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038099 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.043 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa322 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.02.030 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001416 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015081 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/jnci/djw323 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.042 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.024 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.041 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.988619 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011551 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.018 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.058 · DOI
  20. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009282 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.057 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv064 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.05.053 · DOI
  24. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0072 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jia, S., Wang, M., Liu, Y., Gong, M., Jiang, W., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gong, Ming
  • Jiang, Wenjian
  • Zhang, Hongjia
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2024-01-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e031542-e031542
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390406149
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
acute type A aortic dissection, postoperative mortality, fatal stroke, prognosis, carotid artery dissection, surgical repair
MeSH terms
Aortic Dissection, Carotid Artery Diseases, Humans, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Carotid Artery, Common, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review