Cited by 2Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsConnective tissue disorders research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computed Tomography Imaging Measurements as a Surrogate for Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review

Open access
Vo, Thin X., Rahmouni, Kenza, Visintini, Sarah, Guo, Ming H., Ouzounian, Maral, Chu, Michael W. A., Boodhwani, Munir, Appoo, Jehangir J., Tucker, Katherine, Al‐Atassi, Talal, the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative (CTAC)·2024·Journal of the American Heart Association

Abstract

Background: Postoperative computed tomography imaging surveillance is an essential component of care after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Prognostic imaging factors after ATAAD repair have not been systematically reviewed. Methods and Results: We performed a systematic review to summarize postoperative computed tomography measurements including aortic diameter, cross‐sectional area, volume, growth rate, and false lumen thrombosis in addition mid‐ to long‐term clinical outcomes after ATAAD repair. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL in October 2022. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes such as mortality or aortic reintervention after 1 year and included aforementioned computed tomography findings. Studies of chronic aortic dissection and studies of exclusive patient populations such as those with connective tissue diseases were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Searches retrieved 6999 articles. Sixty‐eight studies met inclusion criteria (7885 patients). Extended repairs were associated with improved false lumen thrombosis, decreased aortic growth rate, and decreased rates of reintervention but not improved survival. Growth rates of the aorta post‐ATAAD repair were highest in the descending thoracic aorta. The most frequent prognostic imaging factors reported were a patent/partially thrombosed false lumen and postoperative aortic diameter >40 to 45 mm. Conclusions: Established measurements of positive aortic remodeling, including complete false lumen thrombosis and stabilization of postoperative aortic diameter and growth are the most studied prognostic indicators for improved clinical outcomes after ATAAD repair. Growth rate of the aorta remains significant after ATAAD repair. Future studies should prospectively evaluate and compare prognostic factors for improved surveillance and management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/jaha.124.034496

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 PRISMA diagram summarizing the search strategy. Created using PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams (https://estech.shinyapps.io/prisma_flowdiagram/). 10 PRISMA indicates Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses.
Figure 1 PRISMA diagram summarizing the search strategy. Created using PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams (https://estech.shinyapps.io/prisma_flowdiagram/). 10 PRISMA indicates Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Flow chart summarizing subgroups of included studies. HR indicates hazards ratio; and OR, odds ratio.
Figure 2 Flow chart summarizing subgroups of included studies. HR indicates hazards ratio; and OR, odds ratio.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Range of growth rates in the descending thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta after type A aortic dissection repair. Figure created using aortic diagram from BioRender.com. AA indicates abdominal aorta; and DTA, descending thoracic aorta.
Figure 3 Range of growth rates in the descending thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta after type A aortic dissection repair. Figure created using aortic diagram from BioRender.com. AA indicates abdominal aorta; and DTA, descending thoracic aorta.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Summary of study findings. Figure created using aortic diagrams from BioRender.com. AA indicates abdominal aorta; and DTA, descending thoracic aorta.
Figure 4 Summary of study findings. Figure created using aortic diagrams from BioRender.com. AA indicates abdominal aorta; and DTA, descending thoracic aorta.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. 10.1093/ejcts/ezz071 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.012 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv351 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/14651858.CD013149.pub2 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/jebm.12427 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cl2.1230 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.16879 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.040 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.060 · DOI
  10. 10.5090/kjtcs.2013.46.1.33 · DOI
  11. 10.5761/atcs.oa.15-00015 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.063 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/jocs.12608 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/ejcts/ezr311 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.055 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/icvts/ivz154 · DOI
  17. 10.1532/hsf.1708 · DOI
  18. 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.148 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.11.054 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.043 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.047 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx504 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.067 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx131 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/ejcts/ezy381 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/ejcts/ezac443 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/icvts/ivy094 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.087 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.037 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/ejcts/ezw340 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/ejcts/ezu173 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/ejcts/ezs157 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.054 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.05.052 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/1708538115627728 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s00268-020-05374-9 · DOI
  37. 10.1055/s-0036-1571813 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.010 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.023 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/icvts/ivw044 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.077 · DOI
  42. 10.21037/jovs.2018.04.09 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.004 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa411 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.068 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.032 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.145 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.027 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.005 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.037 · DOI
  51. 10.1510/icvts.2006.132233 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.077 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.058 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.064 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.007 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.070 · DOI
  57. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015081 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx223 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.003 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.061 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.087 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.067 · DOI
  63. 10.21037/jtd-20-2356 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv374 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.047 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.136 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.05.013 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/ejcts/ezv044 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/icvts/ivaa095 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.056 · DOI
  71. 10.1186/s13019-014-0140-6 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/icvts/ivy243 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.084 · DOI
  74. 10.1093/ejcts/ezs121 · DOI
  75. 10.21037/acs.2016.05.06 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad148 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.03.037 · DOI
  78. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702720 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.025 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.071 · DOI
  81. 10.1111/jocs.14446 · DOI
  82. 10.3390/jcdd9100349 · DOI
  83. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1281 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.125 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.042 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.064 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.128 · DOI
  88. 10.1093/ejcts/ezab317 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.11.014 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.058 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.010 · DOI
  92. 10.5195/jmla.2021.939 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Vo, T. X., Rahmouni, K., Visintini, S., Guo, M. H., Ouzounian, M., Chu, M. W. A., Boodhwani, M., Appoo, J. J., Tucker, K., Al‐Atassi, T., & (CTAC), T. C. T. A. C.
Affiliations
  • Ottawa Heart Institute (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Vo, Thin X.
Venue
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2024-09-17
Volume
13
Issue
18
Pages
e034496-e034496
ISSN
2047-9980 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402369427
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • University of Ottawa
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
Keywords
acute type A aortic dissection, aortic dissection repair, postoperative computed tomography, aortic remodeling, false lumen thrombosis, aortic diameter, aortic growth rate, aortic cross-sectional area, aortic volume, aortic reintervention, mortality
MeSH terms
Computed Tomography Angiography, Acute Disease, Aortic Dissection, Aorta, Thoracic, Aortic Aneurysm, Humans, Prognosis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computed Tomography Imaging Measurements as a Surrogate for Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/jaha.124.034496
The paper
Vo, T. X., Rahmouni, K., Visintini, S., Guo, M. H., Ouzounian, M., Chu, M. W. A., Boodhwani, M., Appoo, J. J., Tucker, K., Al‐Atassi, T., & (CTAC), T. C. T. A. C. (2024). Computed Tomography Imaging Measurements as a Surrogate for Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.124.034496