Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Usefulness of a Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Test for Acute Stroke: The Biomarker Rapid Assessment in Ischemic Injury (BRAIN) Study

Laskowitz, Daniel T., Kasner, Scott E., Saver, Jeffrey, Remmel, Kerri S., Jauch, Edward C., BRAIN Study Group·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— One of the significant limitations in the evaluation and management of patients with suspected acute cerebral ischemia is the absence of a widely available, rapid, and sensitive diagnostic test. The objective of the current study was to assess whether a test using a panel of biomarkers might provide useful diagnostic information in the early evaluation of stroke by differentiating patients with cerebral ischemia from other causes of acute neurological deficit. Methods— A total of 1146 patients presenting with neurological symptoms consistent with possible stroke were prospectively enrolled at 17 different sites. Timed blood samples were assayed for matrix metalloproteinase 9, brain natriuretic factor, d -dimer, and protein S100β. A separate cohort of 343 patients was independently enrolled to validate the multiple biomarker model approach. Results— A diagnostic tool incorporating the values of matrix metalloproteinase 9, brain natriuretic factor, d -dimer, and S-100β into a composite score was sensitive for acute cerebral ischemia. The multivariate model demonstrated modest discriminative capabilities with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 for hemorrhagic stroke and 0.69 for all stroke (likelihood test P <0.001). When the threshold for the logistic model was set at the first quartile, this resulted in a sensitivity of 86% for detecting all stroke and a sensitivity of 94% for detecting hemorrhagic stroke. Moreover, results were reproducible in a separate cohort tested on a point-of-care platform. Conclusions— These results suggest that a biomarker panel may add valuable and time-sensitive diagnostic information in the early evaluation of stroke. Such an approach is feasible on a point-of-care platform. The rapid identification of patients with suspected stroke would expand the availability of time-limited treatment strategies. Although the diagnostic accuracy of the current panel is clearly imperfect, this study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating a biomarker based point-of-care algorithm with readily available clinical data to aid in the early evaluation and management of patients at high risk for cerebral ischemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.108.516377

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Laskowitz, D. T., Kasner, S. E., Saver, J., Remmel, K. S., Jauch, E. C., & BRAIN Study Group
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
77-85
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1990022183
Cited by
211
References
1
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Usefulness of a Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Test for Acute Stroke: The Biomarker Rapid Assessment in Ischemic Injury (BRAIN) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.108.516377
The paper
Laskowitz, D. T., Kasner, S. E., Saver, J., Remmel, K. S., Jauch, E. C., & BRAIN Study Group. (2009). Clinical Usefulness of a Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Test for Acute Stroke: The Biomarker Rapid Assessment in Ischemic Injury (BRAIN) Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.516377

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.