The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and 10-Year Survival of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Population-Based Registry
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods— We analyzed data referring to our prospective population-based registry, including patients with a first-ever stroke followed up to 10 years. Results— In a 5-year period, we included 549 patients (247 men and 302 women; mean age±SD, 73.6±12.5 years) with an intracerebral hemorrhage. The crude annual incidence rate was 36.9 per 100000 (95% CI, 33.8 to 40.0), 32.9 per 100000 when standardized to the 2006 European population, and 15.9 per 100000 when standardized to the world population. The case-fatality rate was 34.6% (95% CI, 30.6 to 38.6) at 7 days; it increased to 50.3% (95% CI, 46.1 to 54.5) at 30 days and to 59.0% (95% CI, 54.9 to 63.1) at 1 year. Diabetes mellitus and posterior fossa hemorrhage were associated with an increased risk of 7- and 30-day mortality, whereas older age was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality only. At the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 10-year survival rate was 24.1% (95% CI, 20.1 to 28.1). Conclusions— Intracerebral hemorrhage is characterized by a severe prognosis, mostly in the short term. Because of the high proportion of fatal events that occurs early after the stroke, it is mandatory to identify and apply specific therapeutic strategies for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Dose Atorvastatin after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Investigators (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061894 · Cited by 2,887
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., & Anderson, C. S. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7 · Cited by 1,932
Jackson, C. A., & Sudlow, C. L. M. (2006) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.089292 · Cited by 103
Cited by
miR-124: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Central Nervous System Injuries and Diseases
Xu, J., Zheng, Y., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Li, Y., & Chi, G. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-021-01091-6 · Cited by 55
Wolsink, A., Cliteur, M. P., van Asch, C. J., Boogaarts, H. D., Dammers, R., Hannink, G., Schreuder, F. H. B. M., & Klijn, C. J. M. (2025) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101180 · Cited by 52
Warkentin, L. M., Auriat, A. M., Wowk, S., & Colbourne, F. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.058 · Cited by 50
Douros, A., Ades, M., & Renoux, C. (2018) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-018-0507-7 · Cited by 42
Akyol, G. Y., Manaenko, A., Akyol, O., Solaroglu, I., Ho, W. M., Ding, Y., Flores, J., Zhang, J. H., & Tang, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15455-w · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacco, S., Marini, C., Toni, D., Olivieri, L., & Carolei, A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 394-399
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2005052178
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and 10-Year Survival of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Population-Based Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.108.523209
- The paper
- Sacco, S., Marini, C., Toni, D., Olivieri, L., & Carolei, A. (2009). Incidence and 10-Year Survival of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Population-Based Registry. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.523209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
