The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Characterization of the Computed Tomography Angiography Spot Sign in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Identifies Patients at Highest Risk for Hematoma Expansion: The Spot Sign Score
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— The presence of active contrast extravasation (the spot sign) on computed tomography (CT) angiography has been recognized as a predictor of hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. We aim to systematically characterize the spot sign to identify features that are most predictive of hematoma expansion and construct a spot sign scoring system. Methods— We retrospectively reviewed CT angiograms performed in all patients who presented to our emergency department over a 9-year period with primary intracerebral hemorrhage and had a follow-up noncontrast head CT within 48 hours of the baseline CT angiogram. Three neuroradiologists reviewed the CT angiograms and determined the presence and characteristics of spot signs according to strict radiological criteria. Baseline and follow-up intracerebral hemorrhage volumes were determined by computer-assisted volumetric analysis. Results— We identified spot signs in 71 of 367 CT angiograms (19%), 6 of which were delayed spot signs (8%). The presence of any spot sign increased the risk of significant hematoma expansion (69%, OR=92, P <0.0001). Among the spot sign characteristics examined, the presence of ≥3 spot signs, a maximum axial dimension ≥5 mm, and maximum attenuation ≥180 Hounsfield units were independent predictors of significant hematoma expansion, and these were subsequently used to construct the spot sign score. In multivariate analysis, the spot sign score was the strongest predictor of significant hematoma expansion, independent of time from ictus to CT angiogram evaluation. Conclusion— The spot sign score predicts significant hematoma expansion in primary intracerebral hemorrhage. If validated in other data sets, it could be used to select patients for early hemostatic therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Mayer, S. A., Brun, N. C., Begtrup, K., Broderick, J., Davis, S., Diringer, M. N., Skolnick, B. E., & Steiner, T. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707534 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
Trial of Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Pradilla, G., Ratcliff, J. J., Hall, A. J., Saville, B. R., Allen, J. W., Paulon, G., McGlothlin, A., Lewis, R. J., Fitzgerald, M., Caveney, A. F., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2308440 · Cited by 451
Predicting Hematoma Expansion After Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Brouwers, H. B., Chang, Y., Falcone, G. J., Cai, X., Ayres, A. M., Battey, T. W. K., Vashkevich, A., McNamara, K. A., Valant, V., Schwab, K., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5433 · Cited by 370
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Delgado Almandoz, J. E., Yoo, A. J., Stone, M. J., Schaefer, P. W., Goldstein, J. N., Rosand, J., Oleinik, A., Lev, M. H., Gonzalez, R. G., & Romero, J. M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2994-3000
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2152510270
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.