Cited by 8Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCancer survivorship and care

Psychological Intervention Poststroke: Ready for Action?

Open access
Watkins, Caroline L., French, Beverley·2009·Stroke

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.109.562348

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exclusion of people with milder symptoms of depression will exclude a substantial proportion of people who show symptoms after being diagnosed with an NCD or having experienced an event such as stroke.

    “As commentary papers of one of the included studies highlighted, the exclusion of people with milder symptoms of depression will exclude a substantial proportion of people who show symptoms after being diagnosed with an NCD or having experienced an event such as stroke (Barer 2010; Watkins 2009).”

    From Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults with non-communicable diseases (2020) · cites this paper as Watkins 2009

    In “Psychological Intervention Poststroke Ready for Action?”, Watkins suggests lowering the depression-screening cutoff to include more potentially suitable patients with mild to moderate symptoms after stroke. The passage does not establish that they constitute a substantial proportion of people with poststroke symptoms, and it does not address people diagnosed with an NCD. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hill K. Mood state after stroke and its effect on outcome: a prospective cohort study. III UK Stroke Forum Conference Book of Abstracts. Harrogate, UK; December 2-4, 2008:14. Available at: http://www.ukstrokeforum.org/events/ past_forum_conferences/2008_uksf_conference.html. Accessed May 7, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watkins, C. L., & French, B.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-09
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
2951-2952
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2112824271
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
psychological intervention, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Mood Disorders, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review